IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD971A1DBE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:04:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jp8CN3ZXV9zy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71BC21A1C05 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l13so55804369iga.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0yORFv8hx+LJxvtilutVG01ddT+pIwgQgBN5kScxrHM=; b=nAzM1r7FFqIAibKIXZAxlWC4fWONlS01oUtrBS2Gv4wtBaaBZet1ncuzBr+OynMGfm 1U4YVBZpE1Ef/w9ddh+ic1Sc9j0fkh93cDh9HvlYL0L5FXZs47OtpgufTarqwVqLJlle hQPi5kBP8jBjRu/yNy+FLPHuFLBvv6YKEBu3uZXXZdIRxl2buyPuElsRG0hBZqG93JzE nVypIbWpKX5iYjiGHYWQL/wbpaA5kEzV7X4dJfI7zNh5RP2NoVLg12EYnrKTg99cZ0nL 3ZlcVaymx6WXJpUfW8UjxuHg0nRG0EKHdjoThbBiZA+3DK94V69z2cmF8MZeFsKHDAro mR4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0yORFv8hx+LJxvtilutVG01ddT+pIwgQgBN5kScxrHM=; b=kLzJGDatZ/VpMiCsuBo2epGxbukMVRlOyflLVhRTBCAoepCwR8choC23fMp4V/GlR7 bZPEkIosUsV+ISx9GFIZJkho6kC/XxagLXLsXojMhGB0UPPI9LThXRo0sp02IBDX2fLr xhv9tXG6Kypj+pTTfz0WFQgFUInqugvROPbvj9aOE2NsWzgx8R2axQv0Rp4XBo71NrSZ L008LJIpfC7BkZkwv5vrShrfBKgzbanXHUr/3pH6nnKrme3x5SRX3/iYWn7IcQb9hJNS bQOMe/WdSbEElfHnZYE51qCi94tpS+08m4DCxNSdXlR/KdqnvJic8YJrO6MZXPCeQILp FFPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaOTm3K/c6UdA+OgTnPvb2iD+rnFFMxSStEy9DTqtyc4VQ/7etMILGjDewfpbRo1hbG2PC
X-Received: by 10.50.78.232 with SMTP id e8mr3972854igx.5.1424307844553; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:03:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BF1BDC61-D8BD-4FB3-A111-070D9FF51F60@cisco.com>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BF1BDC61-D8BD-4FB3-A111-070D9FF51F60@cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:03:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr23Q-SA0p1rzNFkBMHeAFj=ZnR_FaMzzfv1_7D8htrgTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c6a20204a38050f6683c0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/u7AhqDO_RCpUtVlc8AF3LFnjZdA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 01:04:08 -0000

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> Before I bother the IESG with it a third time, I’d really like to hear a
> clear consensus, not a rough one. Where it stands right now, that’s not at
> all obvious.
>

So did we have clear consensus? The WLGC was supposed to go until February
15.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email