IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots

james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Thu, 25 June 2015 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870621A6EF2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63Euv-j_NURs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387711A0011 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrt9 with SMTP id rt9so59609948ieb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=HPMh8U36HKjr8Tlhqhw/XpoRd+sd2AsNuwQUqDJWDIs=; b=TiRThd9To7yJFhY9a/aoQpXUZ47WNEmS0BDF14KvQlb90LVAornhODoygN9Q8NIDZv +f3/nMkAn7MwZ0D/Y3SOtnXaEs4TrLK8/ccyNkS1kUmEVP2nPeiuRG1KEX9k6pKDeUeF wkwsdcifKwPLkNjZi38jG/ui6KxoO2E+mTaIw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=HPMh8U36HKjr8Tlhqhw/XpoRd+sd2AsNuwQUqDJWDIs=; b=mMEfYe5kBt2wuAd9kMUFEgnC72pgypvii+XxqY6hQlKxnKtaI5hfMDsKIitCAvppwR 9Zj4F1hMVlLQCfOm4j5GYublDT3F8sj2HFSDDXeZJGxrpcBeIX+8Qz1j9eUnTHGDBB5J i13r7eBmfnxqeBImzpEg6/v8xyoPaQfnU/QXQXUHLahPM9uBalJ1Z4rq1K+SORsCuH9I wkSfwfxkg5aL8sroF8qS+7tDdvgcf396MwjJSxC5JQYcw2Dku2Ghj+eaA3x59P3zSLNU Z3ptaeI6ueRK29wcV/CVa99hjWh6nxQW8DMyxzQqLqZOQse7d5qtQHY8vYL8Mt9sFVKr 999g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWsKBEZPLROCaGoroEwg9Pmq5aWX0Hz4yBEiM7dX7B/sufFtByggIrE8nfAkGvCCysckjR
X-Received: by 10.107.26.207 with SMTP id a198mr61080726ioa.5.1435254303683; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-100-100-99-154.pao.corp.google.com ([100.100.99.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qh9sm3744769igb.20.2015.06.25.10.45.02 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28F6EE26-6307-4D43-BEE5-8117CEFA56F5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <558BC6A3.8030700@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:01 -0700
Message-Id: <FE5E22A4-2BF2-486B-9BE1-A6F0B49E9930@nestlabs.com>
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <1599CF94-9B35-4858-AD52-6FADC8F25671@apple.com> <558ABAC3.4010802@gmail.com> <20150624151015.GN67883@Space.Net> <558ACC2F.7060509@gmail.com> <20150624161858.GP67883@Space.Net> <558BC6A3.8030700@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uyrEpYeyAFdZ3r6ENd9vHqjNPcw>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:45:06 -0000

On Jun 25, 2015, at 02:15, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's why the CarRouters are pure routers and dont do NDproxy.
> And that's why CarRouters need the smartphones to provide them DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in return.

Hierarchical prefix delegation. (Again. What a great idea. Face palm.) I think what Mr. Petrescu meant to say is that CarRouters need smartphones to offer HNCP services. Who will be brave enough to set that standard?


—james here

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email