Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

Geir Egeland <geir.egeland@gmail.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 06:14 UTC

Return-Path: <geir.egeland@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CBE1A0317 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKp6AAyk_Ja8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36F91A0323 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id gf5so6271636lab.23 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=9q/BQXhaNv/OM8X1DDEkesOOZ92jP3YegZCRciC2cuU=; b=rTJ/aH83hitmZrIo29a8KIeIvdMN75oRX9wKXwTZ7P0Yf5eTFkRsYn2YY5fRpA5Hb3 mQ653XvJTE/tP/fi49bXrtaI1fx5iYOueQfIMrwgs1Jg49lFJ7kl0jbiHFxAjvHtc4S5 UxiitCER/0BrCawiocuuy0BIaRumrx+4tkLBjMVhHHPiPYkaHXGMjDwzRwWsF3GN5Cvt aYYTF2x/F3bsPP/n4GR+kbJfnyB09C1/qdibyYFgPQu4F3xp2x0lBOR3hx7Y23f5CpTP TrgkQL9r590n8NafhMaA71e6zdwqIuxOpQWkMO3GCZ6MUUeknMQLHoVnYg4bQISPVLPt g2lg==
X-Received: by 10.112.255.36 with SMTP id an4mr34899749lbd.31.1407737642139; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (ti0125a400-0205.bb.online.no. [88.91.212.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tj1sm16833656lbb.40.2014.08.10.23.14.00 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Aug 2014 23:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geir Egeland <geir.egeland@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Geir Egeland <geir.egeland.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_299A0781-02E1-4A2B-9D54-7BB8A84919E5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQUKP8AkYLsq8PjWWUac9163SeUn4tO1fyWLJC8rsF12Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:14:00 +0200
Message-Id: <A39A706D-0FC2-4A87-930C-C06AD93D423A@gmail.com>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408060856080.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53E1D951.8030200@fud.no> <3f59106bc21840dfb144c7933215294f@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <53E27522.4070901@fud.no> <84A403BD-7E93-4D99-8C11-FB7F91B68154@eircom.net> <0CEE83E4-FA58-4D85-B753-1F218540C624@eircom.net> <53E30E74.7050502@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTjYTzDRC_UbmmwiafAYch-VH=_sOaMWu+tMOQNrcEOCQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB26AAFC-084D-46D6-BBF5-E5C20B5857AF@eircom.net> <CAD6AjGQUKP8AkYLsq8PjWWUac9163SeUn4tO1fyWLJC8rsF12Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vCXLtV2BTJXMPw_mpjMx_EiKPMo
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:43:08 -0700
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 06:14:08 -0000

Hi,

So let me try to shed some light on what we are thinking in Telenor Norway.

Even though we have launched an IPv6-only APN, our main strategy for the home network is to support the Ext. PDP type. Also, both our fixed and mobile network architectures are based on DS.

We are currently working on putting the final pieces together for enabling DS. Roaming brokeness caused by the ext. PDP is a major concern for us. DS will affect our whole customer base, so it will take a while with testing before we are comfortable launching this.

Telenor Norway has been piloting NAT64/464XLAT for some time now with no major issues. We see that we need to support all scenarios for mobile devices, i.e. IPv4-only, IPv6-only and DS. We chose to launch IPv6 on a few selected devices as a gradual introduction of IPv6 in our mobile network.  By enabling IPv6-only on a few handsets, we can identify those mobile operators that do not support IPv6-roaming and we use this opportunity to contact them through commercial and technical channels, urging them to enable IPv6 support on their SGSN. If this is unsuccessful, we will consider steering the roaming traffic away from those operators during a transition period if necessary. We believe it is important to take an active stand on this instead of waiting for everyone to get around to enable IPv6. As many people on the mailing list have mentioned, there are cases where roaming on IPv6 fails. This is also our experience, but it is something we are willing to accept. 

As Tore has mentioned, our customers are free to use one of our IPv4-only APNs, however, we have not had any such requests.

BR,

Geir Egeland
Telenor Group/Telenor Norway

On 07-08-14, at 15:58 , Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Aug 7, 2014 6:17 AM, "Ross Chandler" <ross@eircom.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7 Aug 2014, at 13:56, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree, for my own phone, i roam internationally with no issue on ipv6.
> >>
> >> CB 
> >
> > Cameron,
> >
> > Are you saying the support for IPv6 in the user-plane for visitors is good enough for enthuasists willing to toggle their APN protocol setting when they roam or that the position is already so good that we can all start copying Telenor?
> >
> > BR
> > Ross
> 
> If Telenor has taken this leadership position, then i expect those few lingering issues to be resolved quickly with the problem network operators.
> 
> It is worth revisiting the data before changing default settings.
> 
> In my own network,  roaming makes up for a very small percentage of ip address usage, so the benefit is not very high
> 
> CB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops