IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Re: Dispatching Happy Eyeballs Version 3

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com> Tue, 16 July 2024 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407FBC14F739; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vw56x8oJZVi4; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2a10:3781:2413:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C81FC14F6EC; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1sTgIB-0000M8C; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:24:23 +0200
Message-Id: <m1sTgIB-0000M8C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <35C7852E-FF43-4600-BD93-B05DF82E3AF3@apple.com> <6E2B8558-CD88-4E26-AA6E-60978A886DB3@apple.com> <FB1ECCA9-0776-4928-955F-8EC22EEBE19E@consulintel.es> <BL1PR18MB42779FE990A919F054C3B4FAACA22@BL1PR18MB4277.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <m1sTeUw-0000MgC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <ec4cde3ddb634943b8354cce04b7f944@huawei.com> <m1sTfBo-0000KeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5E6A08C6-B4F9-4822-A3A1-527443406517@consulintel.es>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:18:16 +0200 ." <5E6A08C6-B4F9-4822-A3A1-527443406517@consulintel.es>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:24:23 +0200
Message-ID-Hash: 6BFIX7AMBRMRI3PMEJ3MCT5LYGGOKDT6
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6BFIX7AMBRMRI3PMEJ3MCT5LYGGOKDT6
X-MailFrom: pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Alldispatch@ietf.org" <Alldispatch@ietf.org>, "draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-v3@ietf.org" <draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-v3@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Dispatching Happy Eyeballs Version 3
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vb6LQ8xyQi6RtemUVUhIlmX3-Pw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

> Following the same rule,
> the ISPs couldnt have access to logs in the CPEs, which I believe
> they have using multiple protocols.

You say it like it is a good thing.

I think it is bad if ISPs can read access logs without the user's consent.
The IETF should stay far from that.

Of course, it possible the current CPE logs don't have privacy sensitive
data. If my ISP would like to look at my VDSL pamameters then that wouldn't
concern me.

As soon as it becomes names of sites I visit or IP address I visit, or client
devices I have, it becomes an issue.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status