IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 14 April 2014 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BD31A04E7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgOnwVPjxoKI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0AA1A04B6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:2520:ef8a:477:622f]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A8BB403FF; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <534BFABD.500@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:11:57 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <534BFA08.3030404@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/vcFjxt5k6FcR6L--LSZivS-kRzQ
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:12:01 -0000

Le 2014-04-14 11:08, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
> On 14/04/2014 15:50, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> In a nutshell, it defines DHCPv6 and RA options indicating to the host
>> that IPv4 is not available. Reviews from operations-minded people in
>> V6OPS would be of tremendous help.
> 
> I'm puzzled as to why these options should go into dhcpv6.  Would dhcpv4
> not be a much more sensible place to put them?  Putting them into dhcpv6 is
> a very peculiar layering violation.

This is a comment that has already been made. It is addressed in section
4.1. Did you find the analysis unconvincing?

Thanks,
Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email