IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 19 December 2013 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5611ACCD8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:28:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q01p1Gwzd-tM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BC21AC4AB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:28:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1579; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387412929; x=1388622529; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xkpS7Y5K8YK3jtIzNj7mcEQp6fSOltM3QngVZk4erwQ=; b=auPdDPmkIy/W+ZhFDIQ1/swxBG855S+DD6yADqRXRXZvuHCF7JiUNJ03 Hy1DMLWizL2oYLbjs6FGDkVm2qcfyAxV9675CowNTGwlJEAq0V0TtjMKp DAoL7Bjct8LnSc00voK2k6i8MAqX6VpaSKGoVocfPW3ftsW2+TstP5zH5 U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUFAAo9slKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgwqBDbkhgRcWdIIlAQEBBHcCEAIBCBguMiUCBA4FDod2sWyYTBePEgeDI4ETAQOQM4ExhjKSFIFtgT6CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,510,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="7757850"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2013 00:28:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBJ0SnYn027125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:28:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.86]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:28:49 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
Thread-Index: AQHO/FFIk0gJUsRiT0uKFZtSuRKv3w==
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:28:48 +0000
Message-ID: <41DEF007-F7FE-49E1-9867-4EF386E89C19@cisco.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1311271353550.3903@ayourtch-mac> <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <D437C864-F276-46A6-A51E-4C57E5CF829E@cisco.com> <52B22828.6080700@inex.ie> <52B22B79.3080605@fud.no> <A05B5B4A-066F-43D2-A678-624424CA5FF3@cisco.com> <52B23417.7080907@fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <52B23417.7080907@fud.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.114]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2046F77E-119F-467B-BE15-B8010C10545E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:28:52 -0000

On Dec 18, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
 wrote:

> * Fred Baker (fred)
> 
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> If you want (on-link) /64 routes to be signaled by DHCPv6 you need
>>> another (currently nonexistent, ttbomk) option for that as well.
>> 
>> Does that translate to "what is my prefix length" or some variation on that theme?
> 
> Yes. The only way to signal an on-link prefix to hosts is the Prefix
> Information Option in RA (with L=1), as far as I know. So if Nick wants
> "/64 everywhere", DHCPv6 isn't sufficient, even if it did include the
> default gateway option he wanted.

and perhaps more to the point, if he wants "/65 in domain X and /63 in domain Z"...

So your argument would be that he needs both a default gateway and a prefix length. Is there anything else he needs?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email