Re: [v6ops] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

Hello, Sheng,

Thanks so much for your comments! In-line....

On 19/10/20 23:58, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker wrote:
[...]
> Overall Summary:
> 
> This draft is a document that intents to be an Informational  RFC. This
> document gives some recommendation to  improve the reaction and performance of
> Customer Edge Routers in the IPv6 renumbering events.  It updates RFC7084.
> 
> Overall this is a well written document. There is a small Nit: in the
> information reference, [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] has been listed twice.

Note: [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] is referenced to Ack the folks that 
reviewed that document, on which the present one is based.


> However, I have a more fundamental question. It may be easily addressed by AD
> saying it was not an issue: as an informational document, it should only give
> information or recommendation to the readers or implementors. However, this
> document has a lot of "MUST", which is too strong and I think it should only
> appear in Standard Stack or BCP documents. If so, this document may need
> revise, even rework in the WG.

Please see Section 2. Those terms are *not* being employed as in 
RFC2119, and are employed in the same was as in RFC7084, which this 
document means to update.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492