[v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00 - Admin Policy

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Sat, 01 August 2020 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C233A0AE3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 10:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id efUy--14SQpQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2AB3A0AE1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 10:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 450516F4699D34F4C04A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 18:02:41 +0100 (IST)
Received: from msceml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.143) by lhreml722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 18:02:40 +0100
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) by msceml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:02:40 +0300
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) by msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:02:40 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00 - Admin Policy
Thread-Index: AdZoJDi1DSShQSOKR127T3+c++/N/A==
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:02:40 +0000
Message-ID: <6c0e835ccaa04813a3c37a1df1fe0c40@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.205.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/w61NwRTSt6JTmbbsHKt9V_nfaWY>
Subject: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00 - Admin Policy
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 17:02:45 -0000

I know from discussion with some carriers that some of them filter out EHs intentionally
To avoid any problems discussed in this draft.
It is definitely the reason for EHs drops, but non-technical. It is probably "Absence of use case".
May be it is the primary reason (in %).
Should it be included into the list? Or we should be silent about non-technical things.
IMHO: it would not be resolved up to the business case would be found.
Additional risk and additional processing capacity should have the reward. It is just business.
Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 31 июля 2020 г. 22:32
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers
        Authors         : Fernando Gont
                          Nick Hilliard
                          Gert Doering
                          Warren Kumari
                          Geoff Huston
                          Will (Shucheng) Liu
	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00.txt
	Pages           : 16
	Date            : 2020-07-31

Abstract:
   This document summarizes the operational implications of IPv6
   extension headers, and attempts to analyze reasons why packets with
   IPv6 extension headers may be dropped in the public Internet.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops