Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 14 September 2020 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE643A08AD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e50Ik05HuZuf for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08DB03A083F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1600092974; x=1631628974; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=J6KjWB+SUJsMB24/Dvf1tUD8tPPARoiBjDvFA/cFDOQ=; b=iEix8MPA0bXXP1+lA+QGUmaYRtgzFObnnKBJ9wu4AyDQ8xA1ujWJ0flX 1nlj5KjO9vu1gDjSf6SRm116SGDc6Gx4NjJQh+mPa6I7x3PxIUCUxfkcu YmMXCXZUNHYETy+Hzma56+Ao3xYx5M/5MT698M68Pv4DhUj0+Z/nME/jL VzOQyggOI9gGc/q2l+AUY/6f8eAcJtfNFV3xGGCLZw3I+NJeXa8Qhb2nn /sbEoEMhk3oGutqvvA+uh13dJKU+ZfMB+57Dw+tzaiQS6NdOPDEQzkRyT h9TF2R6By15wPtYY3dszrhMcDmEl4c0zU8cE5P4j0vRwuUI/CcoRMF1iW g==;
IronPort-SDR: yIwANFKFO+SDqOMCZ4DFUO5DfqAEjtJEfpwP2NAwKH4bIDDblXs022unzhZukfSTWFwkOFoVwO N3S1nDobaPY0ebqCYYsp1b75ui+e9FpqApwa8ueLPgHMgPs2aH6mNN1lb3F3EvM8ts4kzQn9E1 FC8oztbP6IsEV9gaqTTIMtUKQMD0LZE5Gjahf7laFlukZhC3TEMhwMv7Edv+jzJ4ti15EjWj2n 4f0zwhrOibU8FCybabFOk/V34ac+pZzRDrH5kFAAYtOKPCJHmMRM1OGJjA1eVrRkEOtWzaU1vv NzY=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2020 16:16:06 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB64941CFF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDB341CFD; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id AC166AFF84; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:16:05 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200914141605.GW2485@Space.Net>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/w6wY2A3Y-DVxzk9O4DHfnfEYEMo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:16:19 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:55:56PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
> The IPv10 I-D is now on it best form, if you will compare the differences between a version and the other one, you will find slight minor difference, the major idea still the same.

Is this compatible with IPv4+?

If not, it needs to be updated accordingly.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279