IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 28 April 2014 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6D71A8834 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgNvW-ZPs2P2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573D11A6FB7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229C9629C8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:08:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D971F629C2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 40834 invoked by uid 1007); 28 Apr 2014 21:08:04 +0200
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:08:04 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Message-ID: <20140428190804.GK43641@Space.Net>
References: <m1WcbPl-0000COC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <118D079B-FC99-4606-B289-4201137A5815@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2f-RH4i3creThGGSx2YxdUTbEW1ACW_0TXz857Kbmv7w@mail.gmail.com> <9B4139A3-77F7-4109-93AD-A822395E5007@nominum.com> <m24n1l8i1a.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <3BA3E5A3-4385-43CE-B73F-A0686AA31B4E@nominum.com> <m238gxpgrt.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <73221D87-5F50-4689-AA42-553AF757ABF5@nominum.com> <m2mwf59uht.wl%Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <7310412C-64E9-4A11-9812-92A969082131@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7310412C-64E9-4A11-9812-92A969082131@nominum.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wNRlrYVd2u_K-OYnJ81BsRE0KZU
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:08:10 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:52:34PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I thought Cisco had a policy of not charging extra for IPv6 upgrades.

*If* the hardware you have is IPv6-capable, and *if* the business unit
in question remembers that policy, yes.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email