[v6ops] Verification on the list
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 26 March 2015 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87281A0004 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xu5UKU1w0q7C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081041B2FD2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2693; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427407496; x=1428617096; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=gLfb0df1TI+L9IzqL8WbnoHHgD5WIB5t8IwDy1tY9Cc=; b=gmCvoGf5BbZ+rTfyq/AKenHH8q9nsvXonetCATz3hxkdqQRIRoyPlCEd cOdF9K8V/CQBX7G/+FoaDPfYgmmQtOV1KVzv6wtPN78HK3vlNHnTSOj4A ZRSBnC/6mro4qqxAfIoVYZThFaL5oKJgQVk3hV/P/KNxNNmI6tXkBB2Vb 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJBQDpgRRV/40NJK1cgwZSXoMOwh+HP0wBAQEBAQF9hBsdBmgBSgI0JwQhiCENogiPTJpAAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEXBJMPL4EWBZBQgWmBMlSGAAGBGoMwiG2GdSKDboIzfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,475,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="135786429"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2015 22:04:55 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2QM4s0w012262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:04:54 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.149]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:04:54 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Verification on the list
Thread-Index: AQHQaBDj34nGpgaLcE+byBta0PP2Kg==
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:04:53 +0000
Message-ID: <EC4BC506-E826-4969-A957-679123D977F3@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.89.12.130]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC4B6343-0B3A-4843-9559-FB025491AF65"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wy7LcPceZ9k2uOt72VUfEhJDuSo>
Subject: [v6ops] Verification on the list
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:05:00 -0000
We have three drafts relevant to scalable use of translation in a datacenter environment: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-eam "Explicit Address Mappings for Stateless IP/ICMP Translation", tore, 2015-01-08 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc "SIIT-DC: Stateless IP/ICMP Translation for IPv6 Data Centre Environments", tore, 2014-12-18 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat "SIIT-DC: Dual Translation Mode", tore, 2015-01-27, In discussion today in v6ops, we agreed to 1) adopt draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-eam as draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam 2) excise that algorithm from draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc and instead insert a reference 3) similarly refer to -eam in draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat The question for the house is “do you agree with the above?”. The chairs will presume that we agree, but invite people to disabuse us of the notion. Tore is looking for review of each and hopefully a co-author for each. Please post reviews to the list. One comment raised in the WG meeting is that this is a minor update to either RFC 6145 (giving the option of specifying a mapping between an IPv4 and an IPv6 address as opposed to using an RFC 6052 IPv6 address) or RFC 6146 (which already has the option of a static mapping, but is fairly insistent on per-flow state as opposed to per-address preconfiguration). It should not be construed as yet another mechanism, calling for a blizzard of evaluation and guidance documents. If RFC 6145 is updated at some point in the future, this document and any other updates and errata would be incorporated into the revision.
- [v6ops] Verification on the list Fred Baker (fred)