IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-horley-v6ops-lab-00.txt

sthaug@nethelp.no Tue, 15 June 2021 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017293A31EA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IqIMPWOEq1DN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D97E3A31EB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0D4E6079; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:17:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:17:32 +0200
Message-Id: <20210615.161732.378898370.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: ed@hexabuild.io
Cc: farmer@umn.edu, v6ops@ietf.org
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <CAE=N4xenXYomTVyTtpbVzw+2ftdYR7SUJdYjT1gArMna7PdTLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE=N4xfvMJw59qQE9gg24GcoK9XXOfjw-CXJ3DsKm3dU4Bk-Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2ZGgdFZsDV7A8GPYXZBQMk0FSh697rNO2J-5h_K0Jz2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAE=N4xenXYomTVyTtpbVzw+2ftdYR7SUJdYjT1gArMna7PdTLw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/x3Cdv-eeXtp0jUKpZnr_E_luyTM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-horley-v6ops-lab-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:17:38 -0000

>> Maybe recommending the Global ID for L=0 be taken from the corresponding
>> 40 bits of the network's GUA Prefix.
>>
>> Just a thought.
> 
> Understood, and a reasonable suggestion, however it still doesn’t address
> that ULA space precedence, effectively makes it useless for dual-stack lab
> scenarios. Even for IPv6 only it doesn’t work unless you take all the
> effort to turn off APIPA.

Some of us use ULA for lab networks with no apparent problems.

Steinar Haug, AS2116

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email