IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 16 April 2014 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4C71A0320 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.123
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.123 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BbdjwWA8d4Tz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08CE1A02CE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id B9779A1; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:11:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DC19A; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:11:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:11:29 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20140416155714.GB64039@ricotta.doit.wisc.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404162310050.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <20140415083615.GB43641@Space.Net> <534D3672.3060702@viagenie.ca> <3446106.k0lm12lQ8b@linne> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161034220.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2D+ZMi-UctuvrMzyqoHqgBy5O26GODT=bRwq0PsvLgLw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404161053110.10236@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20140416155714.GB64039@ricotta.doit.wisc.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xQFTWKcQaCJc8uAmV5w9gamtL5I
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:11:59 -0000

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Dale W. Carder wrote:

> So, I am not in favor of adding more hints that may or may not observed 
> that result in additional complexity and create an even more diverse set 
> of behavior that has to be managed.  This is why I think the only real 
> solution that would work in practice is ethertype filtering.

That still doesn't solve the problem of the enterprise network being IPv6 
only but publishes A and AAAA entries for internal resources on the 
internal DNS zone, because other networks they have are dual stack.

Otoh I think this would be better solved by implementing MIF functionality 
in the device but... oh well.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email