Re: [v6ops] v6ops

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Hi fernando,
>
> IPv10 is not an address structure, it is a “solution” that allows ipv4 and ipv6 to coexist and communicate to each others peacefully without any problems.
>
> I was fighting to make it be used before the problem goes bigger and all of us will pay the delay cost, i’m trying to help as much as i can to make it easier for the benefits of all and move first to the solution before the problem occurs clearly.
>

The fundamental problem that I think you see with IPv6 - lack of
adoption - is going to apply both equality and now more to your
proposal. IPv6 is being adopted, Google are now seeing 30% of their
traffic come over IPv6, and there are now more than 90 000 IPv6 routes
in the IPv6 Internet route table.

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

APNIC are also tracking adoption:

https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6

> Regards,
>
> Khaled Omar
>
> Get Outlook for iOS
> ________________________________
> From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:33:39 AM
> To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org <v6ops@ietf.org>; v6ops-chairs@ietf.org <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
>
> Hi, Khaled,
>
> As a wg participant, may I ask how IP*v10* would be within the
> charter/sphere of *v6*ops?
>
> Thanks,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> On 11/9/20 20:42, Khaled Omar wrote:
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > Hope my I-D is clear for you, let me ask if we can reserve a slot for the IP-v10 I-D to be discussed during the next coming meeting so we can solve the problem that IMHO became clear for everyone even students.
> >
> > Good Luck,
> >
> > Khaled Omar
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Khaled Omar
> > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:56 PM
> > To: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
> >
> > Hi V6OPS WG,
> >
> > Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Khaled Omar
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:52 PM
> > To: session-request@ietf.org
> > Cc: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org
> > Subject: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
> >
> >
> >
> > A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations
> > Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Fred Baker
> >
> >
> > Number of Sessions: 1
> > Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
> > Number of Attendees: 100
> > Conflicts to Avoid:
> >   Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr
> >
> >   Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg tsvarea panrg grow tsvwg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > People who must be present:
> >    Fred Baker
> >    Ron Bonica
> >    Warren &quot;Ace&quot; Kumari
> >
> > Resources Requested:
> >
> > Special Requests:
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >
>
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops