Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A92F1B2A45 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XDUn1_X7w7Dq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31711B2A44 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t5ADnQ6i014137; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:49:26 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BC77204D89; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:52:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0678F203733; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:52:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t5ADnPGM023705; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:49:26 +0200
Message-ID: <55784065.20208@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:49:25 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <54EB1F2F.4000604@gmail.com> <CADhXe503xgpB6cGZC9aVozo+prmQEJ_8w7ELu456na=_ULSMCQ@mail.gmail.com> <557835FE.1020800@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506101522420.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506101522420.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xY2VUyHhLK04-6vDV5wWH-DZ7aY>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:49:30 -0000


Le 10/06/2015 15:24, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>
>> Resurecting an earlier discussion...
>>
>> I hear Apple just announced about mandating IPv6 in each app submitted
>> to store, and about a tech to offer IPv6 hotspots to app developpers
>> on IPv4.
>>
>> Not sure that includes a CLAT implementation on iPhone, nor about what
>> kind of protocol spec can realize that IPv4-IPv6 behaviour (CLAT,
>> 64share, DS-MIP, NAT/NPT, any new?).
>
> http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/06/apple-will-require-ipv6-support-for-all-ios-9-apps/
>
>
> If I were to guess from that article, it sounds like OSX will come with
> a mode where it can create an IPv6 only wifi, and then do DNS64+NAT64
> towards an IPv4 only connection to the outside.

Would that use ULAs inside the IPv6-only  WiFi?

Would it use IPv6 NAT?

I couldn't see otherwise.

> If that is indeed the case, this is great, a lot more people will easily
> be able to test easily if their applications work well in a DNS64+NAT64
> environment.

I agree.

Alex

>