[v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Wed, 07 August 2024 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89711C14F5F8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntcAfwoffVkS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FEFCC14EB17 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cb56c2c30eso938805a91.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; t=1723057772; x=1723662572; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DgGVf/2JDQhLU73Xjqh4GtDScVIhvIN+mlMu7cmKI7M=; b=VcmezvTgx7lMQaAXvSTM5pPdNmJ8IGzxTydZl+dnXTcZ5sAlAW2tm9z3U8m6pChhiJ 3nzyKuwJRh+Xg3Z3cDgViOsXJ3t5ekPPdNWj8ABZvn4XZQcb4YKdNMHMdFTOyGV1EBIR EveetPaKmfcQXTsbt+VhG+XC1rQQ5jRN/NmsU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723057772; x=1723662572; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DgGVf/2JDQhLU73Xjqh4GtDScVIhvIN+mlMu7cmKI7M=; b=vceS5O4NJXGsz60+6yy45nM0q5U/cuB/MXX+QKwNWrTijq5uyHE9ibUm2oByKxV+yr kC5g2HZWx5W8VxKrdn004IV2EevvdwYIEXYlKF5pZUgrUXZTzg/h3KrSAZLRUnUG/f1Q 5iCoTDvn7fw1t+wssA/qzd/jy/jj6FYf8B9HzFKB34JEMWJazcfVFUc03cNm/0RqNKb7 p7JvbPz0ZDF6YnHAJJSqKB82qX+njMxOeVhluCBUW1lr+NlopNxZMnT0+VgQfn/AYcDE 7ejQv2phnJ7AOxc9Zy8eogo0bjIWFAeU0hEWTip6z1lJVFv5psCBpuqhCqsGWWOz9mwd HWcg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWKmrBO2MjGgZqd5G1iWNlAxQDB7ZdOKXNE2qEu9+bP9XjugNt4KSvU/8IWfe3vyT50qxcQ4q6Ej/z5MT2qwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtcChDgkqP5AQSxxbnavZ1x+Btc8Ng7fCQJ9DoQoFlt6KS6W5B JvRj5T9dZUYavvXRpkho/s/r3meobbAFZZzwmcjZhk6Mij7TlOkoTzmD8ZwzkrWYcgVPcoio0nb yqH3gSATt9cZqEOmU3e2bNIFZrhdSE5bM7oChzw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGudvqWGGDxz2N7Q0e7+EDq0fgTlsAf+X0TmZcHp3oy49LjTA+pOGKLJYG3sMxi1uuPIcK8jglXeqQUzh2vBDA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c58f:b0:2c9:63fb:d3ab with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d1b2dc9753mr4479383a91.22.1723057771836; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsEX_x0ORZZ+nYeUQ5Lf83W9GZPwZOfcWpfq5gDtuY7oqk9w@mail.gmail.com> <11d52d74-b53a-4176-8128-5d2aa80320ca@gmail.com> <DB9PR07MB7771A90163C51552F8BCE28CD6B82@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR07MB7771A90163C51552F8BCE28CD6B82@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 15:09:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKtS=yD=PjamVAjW88ZtvNpGqV6QgqPNfPPgfTVBE_wCEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown=40jisc.ac.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006b14cd061f1ca6d6"
Message-ID-Hash: MM2MRVSQ2QNV5EBXQOS2ODFQJEAGJUMT
X-Message-ID-Hash: MM2MRVSQ2QNV5EBXQOS2ODFQJEAGJUMT
X-MailFrom: tim@qacafe.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xciC10TcWoj8JhiaZGcVSOsemCI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tim,


On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 7:24 AM Tim Chown <Tim.Chown=
40jisc.ac.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> *From: *Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 6 August 2024 at 21:53
> *To: *Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>, IPv6 Operations <
> v6ops@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[v6ops] Correction: Re: Working group Last call:
> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
>
> I support the draft going forward.
>
> I do have one comment on the scope of the document. I believe that it
> should also cover use of PD for a locally assigned ULA prefix. Please don't
> turn this into another endless ULA thread - but if the CE has assigned a
> ULA prefix, and supports PD for a GUA prefix, it should also support PD for
> the ULA prefix.
>
>
>
> This seems reasonable.
>
>
>
> Should /64 be hard coded in the document, or should it refer to a prefix
> of the length required to support SLAAC as currently defined?
>
I'm concerned this will cause confusion amongst the CE Router community if
I don't put an actual number.  If you really want we can 64 is based on the
prefix length of SLAAC as currently defined.  How strong do you feel about
this?

>
>
> Minor nit – the “addresses” at the end of para 1 of the intro should
> probably say “prefixes”.
>
thanks, fixed in -03.

>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> (There are several grammatical nits in the Introduction. I'll send them to
> the author off-list.)
>
> Regards
>      Brian Carpenter
>
> On 07-Aug-24 03:18, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > This message begins the working group last call for
> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd. Please read the draft and send your comments
> in response to this email.
> >
> > The draft can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd/ <
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd/>
> >
> > nb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
>