IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Thu, 05 November 2015 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714A11A90CC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QGTidde3Mrz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:53:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515151A90E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [133.93.28.217] (dhcp-28-217.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.28.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id tA59qpg2025458 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:52:52 -0800
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <20151001150947.6527.30286.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr3Xw=ddZieF0OzU=wyqs2P5WXvRh8CXn1S2qS6WEZmb9A@mail.gmail.com> <E616A912-FC4D-4EBE-ABFA-17CD60CC5D79@cisco.com> <563AB457.20302@sonic.net> <ACFC254D-9502-44B8-BAE7-7CD71DC19CA1@cisco.com>
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Message-ID: <563B26F2.5010701@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:52:50 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ACFC254D-9502-44B8-BAE7-7CD71DC19CA1@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbucHSsT1CN45LBWuexC6HPMnwKu+y0bGVROJ2o4VhzYzCQgIlsC5pY43VwEhuehLEYTOQjVSt7/ML9IDSc94nd
X-Sonic-ID: C;Ojhd+qKD5RGIvr0U9jFv0A== M;AN2/+qKD5RGIvr0U9jFv0A==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xciMYzvMdCWcgHBCk86Hsfff5RQ>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:53:05 -0000

On 11/5/15 1:10 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>> Thus I think section 5.2 should be removed and that discussion be had in the 6man WG.
> Dumb question - is your reservation a charter question or a technical question? If it's a charter question, one possible resolution would be to request a supporting 6man consensus statement. If it's technical, that is a whole different discussion.
FWIW It was both as I specified the technically unclear aspects.

    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email