Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 21 October 2020 02:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18063A0ADD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7t385aKlY-1P for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E93E83A09B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id u62so1130344iod.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=BfSP0pp00XhRw391zkvpKMpa1OR4EsyqMzC+HBS5Mfs=; b=YFwVzLw1jJ1Qos6uWsZaNuQciKxvTcx1M9y+oRuPPoX4tZS5vUuObtK5r5ysJCnkyE 7LU9+lyE7bj0Qy8kzCHU7H/L8gdaZ5mkDFMjMIzLcYYorKtPSyVTXhabRYBlL3yq3JyU bogmXl9avyj8GjzAPFJWErokHgpHs8xE/CZMytYxUCqfOYaagNkFFybwnzJw4lhJYQUr PCKDMHNMGkvQRUfdFoLe6nNLJjYmQo2u/4cRV5OBXRHqyHRiz/YsjCNZNc0HHEreU1AD 4QMyMvarLNDO1SNtbhTc3/pTIURe/dGdnAlLZVzBu1LKDAErjV4ECAQCjyFLlnf0ESmR 4U0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=BfSP0pp00XhRw391zkvpKMpa1OR4EsyqMzC+HBS5Mfs=; b=DrKnxqRyOqBkIAnQAJ4bEmiqkSuIWb1CF966Ixz0ymcg3xfOdvRmjnYeTpXMB5bwpx vhnogTcWiX3fM9rkttAioqX4Jx6nmjYHybabVpQ4O0DZeNum7qgD6nc7ynf3vQEuOi1M L6speZR3H/3Iw/UeLGSOQjcXfEESCDrU5rk+JIFobaMb9drtUw0pVy5QVyA1oMAstBxL qTvfMTYIDT9E4t4/Bj74CuFBfOnCSi5FnUrTCfuLL4Vq6hfuB4IxRFh1QlGcSBHY8/pV /RbYTh8FJ3iXNGCYvR1carCSD0L2yAU+8k10fT75Kv8dsmbsCHad/F0JirhP2kv7XQ5R pvIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317ESHNFHtb0ghrc+nTk3qXw+E+eMBlSXa/uzE+RNNxey4rDXVc PwWhP4zORHitQlfZarSXu/VPRQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjQEZOuhnUBd72r6RvTcqcbMBP7ldmVAvtR7bIUDMUcNycoL0l7JU0pyU2/VAkfs4KZib61A==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9381:: with SMTP id z1mr1023701jah.67.1603248530045; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm514666iow.1.2020.10.20.19.48.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <93D28703-4EC0-4BB6-AD7E-287D86EAEE95@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6F5AE56E-7A9B-4E64-B7A5-A67CFE9BD251"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.91\))
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:48:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <90fe62d8-cb16-90ff-c8af-e6b4cfba74a0@si6networks.com>
Cc: iot-directorate@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum.all@ietf.org, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <160312446708.32688.2591314931699003480@ietfa.amsl.com> <43eebbf0-c08f-435b-78ff-d5595d06cbcc@si6networks.com> <B1A116F7-A851-4318-A6A9-B22F40FF6FE4@fugue.com> <90fe62d8-cb16-90ff-c8af-e6b4cfba74a0@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.91)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xk2v9qT8r3IP_oizhF9V5ENUMhI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 02:48:53 -0000
On Oct 20, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote: > The aforementioned values for AdvPreferredLifetime and AdvValidLifetime are expected to be appropriate for most general network scenarios. However, operators should analyze what specific values for these configuration variables would better suit their specific network scenarios. That seems pretty vague. It would be better to say something like: The aforementioned values for AdvPreferredLifetime and AdvValidLifetime are expected to be an appropriate default for most networks. In some networks, particularly where the operator has complete control of prefix allocation and where hosts on the network may spend long periods sleeping (e.g., sensors with limited battery), longer default values may be appropriate.
- [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6op… Ted Lemon via Datatracker
- Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-… Fernando Gont