Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82A51207FD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=delong.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76MAWyevYARr for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3374120047 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.0.85] (rrcs-97-79-186-2.sw.biz.rr.com [97.79.186.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x9T2rcrj027382 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:44 -0700
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 owen.delong.com x9T2rcrj027382
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1572317624; bh=w2LC7jHmlYhDbMr9UWsxPr7mVjpe8FhxWKhelX2KhtM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=30FfKX77k4/Dv9eumI0R9ZwpHTihvtZMNdKtY42bhujbJY00jZEkrrznUFiJB6nIq 8tv1ZQ9RdrhFhDeZybk657jJ8LgToMAtMfFTTzBi7WkYxKsB6UwUa3Mwq1kb645jI3 j9auKpAAIu/yaT+9NJ0vraQDcNrgE0AJKbk+svlY=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <m1iOosl-0000KuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:37 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B022E779-31DD-4DB1-96D1-56E9EE9ECA35@delong.com>
References: <CAO42Z2yQ_6PT3nQrXGD-mKO1bjsW6V3jZ_2kNGC2x586EMiNZg@mail.gmail.com> <B53CE471-C6E8-4DC1-8A72-C6E23154544F@fugue.com> <e67f597d-93a7-3882-3a12-69519178893d@foobar.org> <m1iOinq-0000J3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <DC2F31E2-8CA4-483A-B1A1-6730A904BA32@fugue.com> <m1iOjCf-0000L9C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <413D25D1-5969-4677-B524-8B59850313F9@delong.com> <m1iOosl-0000KuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 19:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xq6_sJq4MdFOOFGXgzSzB7qTlZ8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:53:52 -0000


> On Oct 27, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
>> How does the CPE identify a stale prefix if it hasnt written its
>> previous prefixes to persistent storage?
> 
> Writing prefixes to persistent storage is a key element in letting the
> CPE deal with this issue.
> 

That’s what I thought, but someone called it “incorrect behavior”, so I asked the question.

Owen