IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

"Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk> Wed, 22 April 2015 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7921B1B33CF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MD-dTttyMUI2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0924B1B33CD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.136.35] by server-1.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id F5/0A-20070-CE577355; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:20:28 +0000
X-Env-Sender: nick.heatley@ee.co.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-125.messagelabs.com!1429698027!34988534!1
X-Originating-IP: [149.254.241.76]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.13.6; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 683 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2015 10:20:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtpml01.ee.co.uk) (149.254.241.76) by server-9.tower-125.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Apr 2015 10:20:28 -0000
Received: from EEUKWV0941.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK (Not Verified[10.246.209.218]) by smtpml01.ee.co.uk with MailMarshal (v7, 2, 3, 6978) id <B553775e70000>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:20:23 +0100
Received: from UK30S005EXS02.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK (Not Verified[10.246.208.14]) by EEUKWV0941.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK with MailMarshal (v7, 2, 3, 6978) id <B553775eb0001>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:20:27 +0100
Received: from UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK ([fe80::314c:b96c:4a9a:8a79]) by UK30S005EXS02.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK ([2002:62c:2a4f::62c:2a4f]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:20:26 +0100
From: "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Thread-Index: AQHQYtCVneMUqIFM3UWKOHw0TbKROp0lUOcAgAA3nwCAA2c/gIABUuaAgAFbCwCAABVpgIAAAIqAgAAPA4CAAAtsAIAAbkKAgAGv2wCAABSlgIAA/X4AgAAHmQCAAFthgIAL+9OAgAADYgCAAtG/AIAB4f6AgAD7QgCAAMs5AIAF7pkAgAOeT4CADJ5Bd4AA3PKggAAAeoCAACJCgA==
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:20:26 +0000
Message-ID: <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8C7BE@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK>
References: <CAD6AjGT-hG-uvRQvRosrZtfrf0Nb8ne9jy=tD9oh=5zNM42Xsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcKgK8W+VB1H5EQpHaYiKVYXqOz_2RS-w_CiTf9kL2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe530+OVZrFZVaYh1-zoRDvJhUd0rf4sx6a2nO8SvKmm6zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi140PQ+TF0rED_bQPeS=Fj415qt0-zE2RdGnEL34PAzHyx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjXAeMF6pw5MO2Jrf9B8LJ48D3m1YTVkdBe=_OHjtroQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51TCqU2eMP4LS3DooZxQDAPD95OVJDXbiU7qvuvKCMq+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=zc57+pOA9TFs+0azw0ZR1g67+08T=9eZPHjGXBvgFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe53T_30pj7xxwNs=mWEnd=do6oiq3KgN=U-gHLrLF-gG7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1441574.4C168%wesley.george@twcable.com> <CAD6AjGQrzoBJrqQfKO0N8Ji=oJ-ZP6Sn88sXf=opJ6bYVmTDZg@mail.gmail.com> <552102B0.6070904@cernet.edu.cn> <35D97B17-8E83-43CF-ABEF-122572F1321A@eircom.net> <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe51BDuPhc8wdKGmRiBfSnrz7PMtqYXaoDO+5cwLx_xW2tw@mail.gmail.com> <55290E26.8080500@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe50zz9EtNtifMh+tN9XT-jKCTJB=vsQ6uG515iddOo7f2Q@mail.gmail.com> <5536776A.9060204@cernet.edu.cn> <C ADhXe52HpC1eGtnEw7+yWtOO2-ZEisGe_2Bz9Sz1=JHQQCPhEw@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8C63A@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <67A2A6E4-0603-4E84-8534-EA6C706C6D5D@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <67A2A6E4-0603-4E84-8534-EA6C706C6D5D@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.246.208.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xsJoPzseX1KmQG0op3GOezRp-uM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:20:32 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern A. Zeeb


> On 22 Apr 2015, at 08:55 , Heatley, Nick <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> In the event that there is only one OS ecosystem at the party that doesn’t support the IPv4-socket transition, what story will they tell?

Given the entire “WinXP is still alive and IPv6 story” the timeframe to put to this is at least half a decade to a decade from now.

I think when people here mean “OS” they often think in “mobile OS” but don’t say?

[Heatley, Nick] No I said eco-system not platform version. Each ecosystem needs an IPv6-only story. Whether they use 464xlat or let literals fail, they need a story.



NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for the above-named person(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not disclose or use for any purpose.  
 
We may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. We have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, but it remains your responsibility to ensure that viruses do not adversely affect you. 

EE Limited
Registered in England and Wales
Company Registered Number: 02382161
Registered Office Address: Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9BW.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email