IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Wed, 24 March 2021 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DC23A2F70 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phlGfkGJqqHj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C613A2F55 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (host-79-121-42-153.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 12OFxXBF012441 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:59:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-153.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.153] claimed to be [192.168.1.123]
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAB75xn4ioyzQ5AvUrPKVyuybjZRV__Tv1OMs70Lm-z9bo1Eo6g@mail.gmail.com> <74d6dca7019f44aba09caf47ef703e2f@huawei.com> <CAB75xn7=swhtwqRuV6SoWoMO7jtCcPCc02XiVpAjE=VUx8CyaQ@mail.gmail.com> <6059897e.1c69fb81.ac270.d863SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <749643a7-313f-4bd1-8bb8-7dc26d830070@gmail.com> <605aae8f.1c69fb81.8a8ed.04b7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <35c4cf4f-0128-dff6-27a3-4cc868539f7f@gmail.com> <9614BF99-431D-4046-9762-0F111AFBB27D@consulintel.es> <a498117e-4834-41f8-5c90-ad7734d07220@hit.bme.hu> <e770fec1-2189-f683-6c74-36e32541c53d@gmail.com> <abe65114-d9c9-10ee-2c78-449051acbb61@hit.bme.hu> <3c50c72b-b606-a6cf-3095-f08ad48eecf5@gmail.com> <2A0C2B40-2DA4-4941-A09F-5BD31EDA3301@consulintel.es> <2e64b426-3a0a-b5f8-0306-005e9f1023d0@gmail.com>
From: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <72754d29-8b57-66fa-2b3a-fc6680c339f2@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:59:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2e64b426-3a0a-b5f8-0306-005e9f1023d0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.153; helo=[192.168.1.123]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/yGzrUm02T6m5K_h8Xpvi9Ae_I-8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:59:46 -0000

Dear Alex,

On 3/24/2021 4:12 PM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
[...]
> Does IPv6 mandate the use of DNS64 and NAT64?

Of course, not. :)

There are several IPv4 as a Services solutions exist. We have covered 
the five most prominent ones 464XLAT, DS-Lite, MAP-E, MAP-T and lw4o6 in 
our I-D: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-06

Your ISP is likely using one of them.

Best regards,

Gábor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email