Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

"Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lee.howard@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8A51AC3F4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:49:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.664
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 820TsdkeXwZC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdpipgw02.twcable.com (unknown [165.237.59.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABF1AC40C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:49:22 -0800 (PST)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.64.163.155
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,236,1444708800"; d="scan'208";a="853195843"
Received: from unknown (HELO exchpapp14.corp.twcable.com) ([10.64.163.155]) by cdpipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 02 Nov 2015 19:41:57 -0500
Received: from EXCHPAPP15.corp.twcable.com (10.64.163.156) by exchpapp14.corp.twcable.com (10.64.163.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:49:02 -0500
Received: from EXCHPAPP15.corp.twcable.com ([10.245.162.20]) by exchpapp15.corp.twcable.com ([10.245.162.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 19:49:02 -0500
From: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
To: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>, 'IPv6 Operations' <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
Thread-Index: AQHRFU89fgZyr/YcA06ueb9nvYwyhp6JxBoAgACOEYA=
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:49:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com>
In-Reply-To: <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.7.151005
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.64.163.240]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.1191-8.000.1202-21918.002
x-tm-as-result: No--51.656300-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <A2F7561B1B31DE4DA5463601D203A3B4@twcable.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/yH7jBMa5O_i7Zof1y524vEpSb2Y>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:49:24 -0000

I see interest from Victor Kuarsingh, David Farmer, Alexandre Petrescu, and
Brian Carpenter. Can I ask each of you to do a review of the current
document, and send comments to the mailing list?  That will give the
authors
and the WG something to work from.

Following that, we can discuss whether we need additional discussion at a
meeting, or WGLC.

Thanks,

Lee


On 11/3/15, 9:20 AM, "Victor Kuarsingh" <victor@jvknet.com> wrote:

>WG,
>
>My input is that we should continue this work.  Given ULAs are already
>in use, having a document which outlines those use cases is, in my mind,
>operationally beneficial.
>
>Perhaps we should be more clear that we would not be recommending the
>use of ULAs, but keep to a unbiased document which outlines how they
>have been used (just a use case discussion).  We can also include
>objective technical points as to the pros/cons related to each use case.
>
>It was also noted in another email (based on WG v6ops discussion
>yesterday), that one such valid example was Cable Modem management IPs
>assigned ULA based addressing.  This is a valid technical use case.
>
>I am willing to help if required on this document.
>
>regards,
>
>Victor K
>
>On 2015-11-02 6:17 PM, Howard, Lee wrote:
>> This document hasn¹t had any revisions or discussion in a while.
>> Is there anyone interested in working on it?
>>
>> If we do not hear any interest, we will abandon this draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>>proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
>>to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended
>>solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
>>If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby
>>notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken
>>in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is
>>strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>>E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
>>delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>


________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.