Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> Sun, 26 October 2014 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mpetach@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6181A1B81; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.423
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REeQtyfL05_5; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22c.google.com (mail-yh0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535851A1B92; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v1so1074797yhn.17 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VsrcER5c6KJONnYZ3fwRc/bxSunaNl6pFrMDsTMce9Y=; b=Oxq+HmtaQoO1e3q4mFM+iuruiJj9pl6byPgZ4h6sj1pzD6ljgSXNCUE5hisPvO4s/9 RBsP+6aVHZI1QAaVPX2hu6ylzJ9sD4bWRvokmUvlhusxdRx1aA3erBba2FZSCLTiylys NlRX+0ixnMi3dxTCFfmi/lEfis0INovd9G0E2LtcSTNdi4WkoaO/VBb+u3x5/fUsMPIU kmxrgiTncNdi/Uso80amIpYa1fzFvRIluYNNRIfmO4bjg8srnihYFmrWQKMQnEpWcW/C sqcsUn74u7bHQpZMjIIMGjYtoXu2Kg5ezqiRYQuvpXNVUjjRU4M8Zlh9qzqXd9Mk35BZ 63Zg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.161.10 with SMTP id c10mr16980278ykd.9.1414288965559; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mpetach@gmail.com
Received: by 10.170.126.199 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20141023084132.GE31092@Space.Net>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <755DE4C3-CDDF-41AF-BA9C-E8EC5B4DFC4C@muada.com> <A7F6BEA0-BCDD-4197-B6CB-7EB8797ACA9C@delong.com> <20141016233533.1B73521A106C@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAEmG1=r7UdeStcqFjiQRO_Vt1hfR_T4oyTW5FD-eD1ATEXpc6A@mail.gmail.com> <20141017010552.9682921A4D54@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAEmG1=qi2YcBrMC8__32PFPzD6OfycTbJqeV9g_WbOs7+T14gA@mail.gmail.com> <20141023084132.GE31092@Space.Net>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:02:45 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9Y_0nb7E3A-Cn1pWStH7hX4USq0
Message-ID: <CAEmG1=pG5ORx6fhZZJZuk3aqtNjNPZrNv9aasdqZTMP66AxfPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1139a30466eb77050649cf41"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/yX6MHBBGV3WF_-K_wh6-0VV4RVc
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 02:02:52 -0000

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 06:18:34PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
> > The probability of us figuring out how to scale
> > the routing table to handle 40 billion prefixes
> > is orders of magnitude more likely than solving
> > the headaches associated with dynamic host
> > renumbering.  That ship has done gone and
> > sailed, hit the proverbial iceberg, and is gathering
> > barnacles at the bottom of the ocean.
>
> What I find scary in this statement is the underlying "one solution must
> fit all users" mentality.
> ...
> No, Owen's home does not qualify for a typical "SOHO" network, and most
> likely, none of the other readers.  Ask yourself, what is needed to make
> the network on your parent's home work (assuming those are not network
> engineers).
>


Totally fair point, Gert--and you're right, I'm biased
in my thinking, as I'm focused on all the use cases
I run into, at work and at home.  I'm not used to
thinking of "web browsing only" type users, for
whom prefix changes won't have as much of an
impact.

But you're right.  My home network, Owen's
home network...indeed, most likely none of
ours would be the anticipated target of such
efforts.

Thanks for the reminder, that when it
comes to networking, we are the 0.1%.  :/

Thanks!

Matt



>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
>