IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Thu, 27 September 2012 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C95221F8512 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.414, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qiC64ghD0oW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A95E21F84EB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6471; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1348753066; x=1349962666; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=pIHuVSjKcpaSAFejiUw0UV+7eCVmKPtXtps9uA8Q4p0=; b=bo9HAfyRTH//6lZY1h+Ucd+/DH22Jsq5/tHjfHg0RYFqQr9ZxH1qKG+Q S3ftv8IND++L4WthHK8tsIkgKfqHCeRrxkcwqKw2mBfW/uA/jDUDOJwV0 r4RBBFmFj7W6nPPUD121HXAChSPabzMPZhOh6L+78uy1Sy1lnd4RTl4Nu U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EACRWZFCtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABFvgWBCIIhAQEEAQEBDwFbCxACAQg/BycLFBEBAQQOBSKHYwuYJJ97BIsYhT1gA4gjihWDMY5CgWmCZw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,495,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="125947904"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2012 13:37:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8RDbjAl018102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:37:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.230]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:37:45 -0500
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update
Thread-Index: Ac2a9Fg0kygjt2tHRWm0TALPSDGcNgBgMHlAABf1q4AAAIC/gP//vKTd
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:37:44 +0000
Message-ID: <7070F69F-060D-44BF-9B05-A95E876F241D@cisco.com>
References: <1B2E7539FECD9048B261B791B1B24A7C3EBE458308@PUEXCB1A.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5B123A8C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <20120925133859.15A2.8FE1F57E@jpix.ad.jp> <523CF185-5C72-4299-B4DA-3CEDBA7466D3@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44DED0@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr2CRmEd+-+2NGPwfrgfJrge4GHk=Xeba-A7PbxDKaSVgw@mail.gmail.com>, <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44E1D7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E5E44E1D7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19214.004
x-tm-as-result: No--35.908500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7070F69F060D44BF9B05A95E876F241Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:37:51 -0000

I actually don't mind this being listed, given that it is bout

Cheers,
Rajiv

Sent from my Phone

On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:39 AM, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> wrote:

Dear Lonezo,

As there are several channels which may be used to provision the dns info, we thought it is useful to provide a guideline for the host which information to select.

This modification is only added in my local copy. If you think this is not a good idea or it does not make senses, etc, your comment is welcome.

Cheers,
Med


________________________________
De : Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo@google.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 27 septembre 2012 14:24
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : jouni korhonen; MAWATARI Masataka; v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>> wrote:
                 If the cellular host receives the DNS information in
                 several channels, the following preference order MUST
                 be followed:
                 1.     PCO
                 2.     RA
                 3.     DHCPv6

Why does this order need to be specified in this document?
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email