Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Noah <noah@neo.co.tz> Mon, 17 July 2017 06:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noah@neo.co.tz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D68F12ECF0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neo-co-tz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K96isS8FJlv6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87F712EC0D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a10so6098363wrd.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neo-co-tz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XQIjX8j7DtUuHH3fPIaulmNNeiFbH4eZj4+TzTQGrVo=; b=c+xEGUCpOvIbp4OVd0kFPz4FPgSUmU3OjxoURuZlR8VHRgpKHmKci0d8dN9eG9e5X+ JYJMhflhTeXeaWqMOcTmDfwy2Y4FTUGcsSXg/npIP4WGuaIVttMzyIA+TXBxCpJARhsX bCuST0CErwvq6rDMID/h+Jfp4eF+CD/FnlSiVltsFNHEkIOhbyQPusBHp0rWhJxEPVj2 JHckka5H1dbdeHt2JZUmewN3Sn3AvyPsBO3ITgdsCkJyIrtK+XfoHOw5MKLeXQCirMQF 1P1MRCrMt6t7n0krbwGDcWR+zxqUhE/tNYpT1mIyUNFYpHkbHM7hDSrN8ZqVebgeb3+r RIBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XQIjX8j7DtUuHH3fPIaulmNNeiFbH4eZj4+TzTQGrVo=; b=J8tqLR1peQK+SDRN9AQEr6laLhfqC0K59gldTMeVh2gEwK+BePEKqZZuS+vwr25pgc C5L78lboS11K/GifwkNc71V+noRXHx15Lkkf3CBkCbBmGA1KH6keg1/HVnjEmBlG+PDw ZIzm6Z0cG1APezWD64LToQz45XOZvHkzOFQP1A/5xBL6F6/nWIPp+SbARxwcRGAUWyG9 QKEGtPjDJfVB8uwZ2ihim8Ifi4ObXu15XVL7LcNvXrePb7rkfkBypFI8bawusVEOh+Pn PBfXGTwHVnQswhrDxxO5oTjWoBYZLAMP3JPBef2tsBqKSBn1OdUV+CoH64224A3sN8TT ZioQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113emBSuidrIaEIZ9i4RiZ10+fljmTaAZGCJUG7DIJf8DCfLOSjH dpza8twCtAVS7yg3RpCtm3hGPGf2mfVr
X-Received: by 10.223.162.208 with SMTP id t16mr11796384wra.151.1500272054185; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.206.4 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [197.250.99.209]
Received: by 10.28.206.4 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es>
From: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:14:13 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ea352db447105547d4eb1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/yvDI9wbkYJSqaOhKsfgcPvC5d_o>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 06:14:19 -0000

On 17 Jul 2017 8:26 a.m., "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
wrote:

In my opinion such kind of experiment should be only done once we approve
the document as RFC, note before, so by the next IETF meeting (hopefully).


Hi Jordi

Why not, this would be very interesting considering the times.

Perhaps we can try for 1 or 2 days for experiental purpose as need not to
wait for final RFC and the outcome could also feed the current draft as is.
Who knows.

+1 for below option if possible.

-  IPv6 only per the I-D for one or more days this week?

Cheers
Noah