Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

<> Fri, 30 January 2015 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0F01A88AF for <>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQx_aBslOgz4 for <>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC0B1A891C for <>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.201]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id BF9E83742DC; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:13:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown []) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9E6D438404E; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:13:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([]) by OPEXCLILH03.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:13:44 +0100
From: <>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <>, V6 Ops List <>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
Thread-Index: AQHQOxuJv5W9vu3skUKiVKZnDa9kKZzYQVRg
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:13:44 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049024B2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version:, Antispam-Engine:, Antispam-Data: 2015.1.30.14818
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:13:49 -0000

Hi Fred,

Thank you for initiating the call. 

>From my editor window, the recommendations as included in this version have all been listed in the version that passed the WGLC and IETF LC. The main change is that we removed all the reco that are present in RFC7066/RFC6436 + remove the "special language" as per the IESG's request. 

Saying that, we are open to tweak the text to record the feedback from this call.


-----Message d'origine-----
De : v6ops [] De la part de Fred Baker (fred)
Envoyé : mercredi 28 janvier 2015 17:58
À : V6 Ops List
Cc :
Objet : [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile has been through Quite a bit of change in the IESG. The ADs would like to see the working group read it again and comment - working group last call - before they proceed. To summarize, it provides requirements for handsets that would work in a specific business model. As such, it builds on RFC 6434 and 7066, strengthening some of those requirements, and going on to add requirements related to 464xlat and other technologies.

Please read it now, and comment. This WGLC will run until 15 February.