IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

"Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com> Tue, 30 March 2021 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pengshuping@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87413A2C09; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 01:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcMX-Fk4NLYE; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 01:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194933A2C06; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 01:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F8jrC6Y7nz684dc; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:52:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) by fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:57:21 +0200
Received: from DGGEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.40) by fraeml738-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:57:21 +0200
Received: from DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.141]) by dggeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0513.000; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:57:15 +0800
From: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison@ietf.org" <draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison@ietf.org>, "draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org" <draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
Thread-Index: AQHXIsXivTLWM2Anz0KNnwcp3xEZ86qcOAcQ
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:57:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE19A58416@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <59B5C1F7-48E4-4915-BAAC-41D8ADA29E8F@gmail.com> <18ea74665936408bb33f20630da95311@huawei.com> <E0757B36-8FFB-43A8-8F8B-A7F152F81156@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0757B36-8FFB-43A8-8F8B-A7F152F81156@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.153.195.12]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/z1OhRlYdMug-d8gXyY_TePGSmCo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:57:36 -0000

Hi Fred, Folks, 

I support the adoption of this work. 

I found the "Call for action" section is very valuable, which lists the aspects that could be further investigated. The WG could work more on these approaches and actions. 

References could be also added in the sections regarding the IPv6 extension headers to refer to the currently ongoing related works. 

Best regards, 
Shuping 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:58 PM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison@ietf.org;
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
> 
> 
> 
> > On Mar 19, 2021, at 1:39 AM, Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > For lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison, on behalf of the authors of
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment I can say we are in favor of the WG
> adoption. Not only is it a good description of the transition technologies to
> IPv6, but it also constitutes a basis for our draft.
> 
> OK, let me put this to the working group. We asked about adoption of
> draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison once before (in January 2020), and
> got essentially no response. It has come up on the list twice since, in July and
> in November. The authors of draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment would like to
> see it adopted. The two sets of authors are disjoint. I therefore have at least
> nine people that would like to see us adopt and publish it. What other folks
> have opinions, pro or con?
> 
> Along the same lines, are there opinions regarding the adoption of
> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment?
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-lmhp-v6ops-tr
> ansition-comparison%22
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-
> deployment%22

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email