IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344E71A0423 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAHtcUxL7_Sw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8531A02BB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id h3so2290739igd.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=yasgnoAni3AMJw18fh5fH6KQN7wl+fJf7oqgSDYTteU=; b=fS4W68k4o+t4NNIp0HEdYPXjpNWN+SiSj2BHk0vlPGcKU0ZRwGPwMi+DufPo0XSf1y FRckW/gh3AJHFIOxJUWj7twG81dky7c8Y5+Cs8h3cYbfBIZmDQqgLlCHrZfbyLSKyN4t sUZZIk25qTQigD0djiB+T16UjpQ00I+blee3++GU4XjffJwZJzmvTknueAiancVLb1gv G7TYllT6sfxtV6TcRrG72QHraCcQKkdYdFmgOYD3v+XbDrQeNpPD2lesl3NLceRiB7AN XA53ctVCm6wtJl/G7dooJzNB3/X71+pUllARRhIAvBnaLg1bONnZYwbBcJgiNkcJVJiG W2JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=yasgnoAni3AMJw18fh5fH6KQN7wl+fJf7oqgSDYTteU=; b=EMChyzzR5xiOCdG0j8dIavmT/TGAdnhDp3zU8FVJeycpSHB6AY/knFNbLhSlMc32wA JjFzIZm/kGAy3mxbHYLoxg3t+Htn5bwO5pBYs06s0CMoVt+48Y7l/IMY1A7o9+ElF5uY Z+RFDwMLR3RZn69niruc0PXq00WPiY0xphCSEA3SDgnH6U2ZwCQ98zP1Rug8dGNYPEHS CakR9yCBGPjaR3jrYRC2AIG6p6K/nZFFUJ3ak4EawGJYXa2p0mT4dA9MgwAWMCEoIy1f n+pEoS8+nBq03ZCaXygmz0YvwQy4Vpj/HonvygGpghBx+QtavezjIokzpNUP2RGs589+ IpjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmneB6oG+NuhtYsAEWxCU/LXtF/fgGjfilBx8KLHlxZ1WjbHKtbXR5w37TiSTVFdYxoqQ9LWm1sQJN5/i+umyHXqODIteiJlbj3onGSJf8nUzE9JWUI09DP4MfYjhvJtGXvqALZIroidZ+Yv/qy0Bx0UPxy5BcgEryY0AZC5Fnx/pb44DMLRpGdeEnWLjiT0vsJfcmK
X-Received: by 10.43.153.68 with SMTP id kz4mr29071835icc.29.1392859088794; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:18:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.18.136 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:17:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <53052B43.2070904@gmail.com>
References: <20140214091302.13219.20624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m21tz6javn.wl%randy@psg.com> <1442fd6c81e.5859224653900445752.5189762259388794287@internetdraft.org> <52FEBE28.1010006@gmail.com> <8E2A8B56-6F05-4F09-BE7E-651B9CA42458@delong.com> <5300CE32.1050808@gmail.com> <BD473E46-E382-44E6-B474-A56D074318FA@delong.com> <530104B3.3070205@gmail.com> <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com> <20140217110013.GA31822@mushkin> <62FF9B8A-2F21-4FDD-B1D2-82B8C02A21B3@delong.com> <37638184-17C6-4C8B-86B1-C596A5A5504A@nominum.com> <530242C3.4070108@bogus.com> <E91E49CA-7BA6-4DA3-B4F3-46BB0F25F8F1@delong.com> <5303CD3E.1010907@gmail.com> <m2a9dnr4vk.wl%randy@psg.com> <5304BAAF.60608@gmail.com> <53052B43.2070904@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:17:48 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2fyZ9FezX5dh=P-PiruiOqKBKO9f5hroD-CHDJS+ZMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2ecd835d12004f2cc4784"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/z3MehxaeSXuhG9WKLL32aYdQdtw
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 01:18:16 -0000

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1. More than one party not following the spec on how to generate
> a ULA prefix - so they will be punished for their own mistakes.
>

How are they punished? And what will they do when they are punished? I
guarantee that renumbering will not be the solution, NAT will be the
solution.

2. A piece of remarkably bad luck, rather less likely than
> winning any lottery I'm aware of.
>

You assume that people will actually follow the rules instead of saying
"let's just do this like IPv4, and use NAT at the border".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email