Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:05 AM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> Thank you.  The introduction now seems to me quite clear, and lays out
> the case for the procedures the draft introduces.  I also appreciate the
> caveats and clarifications in the Applicability and Limitations section (5).

Thanks a lot for review and feedback, Joel!
I'd like to confirm if you think that the current version of the draft
is ready to complete the WGLC?
>
> Joel
>
> On 10/6/2023 11:48 AM, Jen Linkova wrote:
> > Dear v6ops WG,
> >
> > We have just submitted the -03 version for
> > ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device - thank you very much to everyone who
> > provided feedback!
> > Please review and let us know if the draft is ready to progress.
> >
> > The main changes:
> > - Introduction is rewritten (much shorter and, hopefully, more clear)
> > - some text about multiple addresses use cases moved to Appendix.
> > - The Applicability and Limitation section is moved up, so it's in the
> > beginning - hopefully it would help the readers to understand what
> > scenarios are in scope and what are not.
> > - Client Mobility section added to discuss what happens when a client
> > moves between network attachment points.
> > - the draft is now explicit that it focuses on "a pool per link"
> > scenario, which also drastically simplifies the routing and relay
> > requirements (the routing section is updated as well).
> > - the draft now suggests Active Leasequery as one of the mechanisms to
> > keep the relay state in sync with the server.
> > - The Prefix Consideration section has been updated and states that
> > the endpoints are not required to use SLAAC - it's just the network
> > allows them to do that, if they need to.
> > - various changes to address other comments received during the WGLC so far.
> >
> > I'd like to ask everyone who has expressed concerns during this WGLC
> > (you are in Cc: - hopefully I didn't miss anyone) to review the new
> > version and let the author know if you still have concerns.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:35 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.txt is now available. It
> >> is a work item of the IPv6 Operations (V6OPS) WG of the IETF.
> >>
> >>     Title:   Using DHCPv6-PD to Allocate Unique IPv6 Prefix per Client in Large Broadcast Networks
> >>     Authors: Lorenzo Colitti
> >>              Jen Linkova
> >>              Xiao Ma
> >>     Name:    draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.txt
> >>     Pages:   18
> >>     Dates:   2023-10-06
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>
> >>     This document discusses an IPv6 deployment scenario when individual
> >>     clients connected to large broadcast networks (such as enterprise
> >>     networks or public Wi-Fi networks) are allocated unique prefixes via
> >>     DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD).
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device/
> >>
> >> There is also an HTML version available at:
> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.html
> >>
> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03
> >>
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> v6ops mailing list
> >> v6ops@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >
> >


--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry