Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 15 June 2011 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5821F0C65; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EtotTQsjj7q; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.32.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D1B1F0C61; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875E015356D; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:02:03 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1308099723; bh=Mj2C9ZnZ69N5v0 UR7zepE5rS2tIrBtpD/aIBFkclXrI=; b=1P9h3C9rJYdTOHdmCCtUtc43CJlsrc +wtzP4tEkZbqA+rQfYpu1s5VYtcK/AXOvyHC8wkSYiCrDtM1MrDiHlB9TNJSjkok 9L+CN8TiBIVjvtP5fz6jEQy8DCHm5oe2KvHOe3cwXDWFrOv6lDQLq/CVCrZW57ZY LD/GQoJS16qQ4FPna4she1X1SIUtUBNdFiBtGyRqpywKazPpWDNXHAkwiUdzp5bO O7aLIDfel+UdfAvtYVtZOuMf6kr2Aq8ztfkol2jF/F/blHPVLoksZ4STQmJCGIHA 4jcMTaTilXO86ksmo3rR1EzNr7ftZCzS8+JmBmCz+/Zk6AU7L/UUBLDA==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id rJIjJSlGLEuV; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:02:03 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (unknown [86.46.27.52]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5361B15356B; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:02:00 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4DF8047D.9000209@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:01:49 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <4DEA6323.4070302@cs.tcd.ie> <4DF69899.2050606@cs.tcd.ie> <4DF77E98.8030300@ericsson.com> <D118E0D7-292A-45BE-B794-9D16CA37A3BE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D118E0D7-292A-45BE-B794-9D16CA37A3BE@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:02:11 -0000

All,

On 15/06/11 01:42, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> 
>> RFC5157 IPv6 Implications for Network Scanning
> 
> Personally, I think that RFC has been overtaken by events. Network scans have been reported in the wild.

Ok, that's not currently included and given its not
clear (to me at least) I'm gonna leave it out.

I think we've accumulated enough references at this
point - its never going to be a complete list and
even if it attempted to be such, it'd probably be
so long as to be useless.

So I'm no longer taking additional reference
recommendations unless a whole bunch of people
say the same thing and otherwise I'm gonna stick
with the current list as sent in a reply to Joe
Touch a few minutes ago.

If there're text edits that are *needed* then I'll
take those for a couple of days more but I reckon
we've iterated enough here.

Thanks for all the help with this, I think we're
done now basically.

Cheers,
S.