IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75321F86EE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LGSqW07kYnom for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78E921F8678 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 902AB3B426B; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH21.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.28]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 142164C069; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.7]) by PUEXCH21.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.28]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:01:01 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>, Reinaldo Penno <rpenno@juniper.net>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, "draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org>, "pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:00:59 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIu2t8cEmEfoUVRZO+1VXRKDAbdgE8IbWQAAF+JmAAAQcFQAABAmmgADzIQZAAAIIVAwABTXKAABZhtKA=
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0DB2@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C30313115B@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <CAC49E75.55A41%rpenno@juniper.net> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303131193@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303131193@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.10.20.81517
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:36:15 -0700
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP <loic.meillarec@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org>, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:01:05 -0000

Dear Hemant,

For that case, we are considering:

* Enable a UPnP IGD/PCP Interworking function as specified for instance in: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bpw-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-02

* Just like current port forwarding in existing CPEs, we are envisaging to allow the configuration of port mappings using a User Interface. This will trigger PCP messages to be sent to the PCP Server controlling the DS-Lite AFTR.

For those who want to play with the PCP Client UI and IGD/PCP IWF, we made a code available at: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/.

Hope this answers your question.

Cheers
Med 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shemant@cisco.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 20 octobre 2011 01:14
À : Reinaldo Penno; BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP
Objet : RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Reinaldo,

Thanks, understood.  However, my question to the DS-Lite folks is still not answered because I was told by them that DS-Lite needs PCP.  So then I asked what if the Windows host behind the CE router does not support a PCP client, then what is the PCP server/proxy inside the CE router do for DS-Lite?

Thus my question is still un-answered.

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: Reinaldo Penno [mailto:rpenno@juniper.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 6:34 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

If windows does not implement PCP Client then the option is to implement:

- UPnP/NAT-PMP - PCP IWF

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bpw-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-02

I mean, assuming there is an application that wants to open ports.

Thanks,

Reinaldo

On 10/19/11 3:21 PM, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> wrote:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email