IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 12 October 2021 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C77C3A03FE; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=delong.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id netQjVum-v0l; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6883A03F7; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([IPv6:2620:0:930:0:b53d:cd2e:d42:52fa]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 19CJSsbe3449918 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:28:55 -0700
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 owen.delong.com 19CJSsbe3449918
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1634066935; bh=A8eca2o24yGd4W+LzhtRKfEky8rpv/fzmtW3Y4Q5DJY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=GzyRGLCSPez6YYMcwNqcJdr4FVeIwRbthZ2NXnJ15uAfld+Q/pMRpTdbpkTxBR+OX H77SaCGH+2eACvUJN3JcntjNUaGRdRjMGvzo711OEFX3H5likAXsm0MzrA923E/qtQ dmxCin9HVmdoaZ3Y9iy46ONQhGZEX5t+PAPooyqQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <YWW1ghmjueHmfCEb@Space.Net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:28:54 -0700
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D28AB77-CA86-4289-A2F1-7DFCC6FB0597@delong.com>
References: <DM6PR02MB69249D4F0A8003E77EC9F153C3B19@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <E1FED93B-674C-46DD-8C39-F6C30475C48A@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr34jv_N0jGKdg=sG76oGU7PdRjYFC_-w9Uvzs=7oGm38w@mail.gmail.com> <E6316781-AC7D-438F-B216-75B1DF9217DC@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr10OKMJ1y8bs5xpt6jS8ZWsqs66oFCXmp-QLySS5Yn4hg@mail.gmail.com> <5DF8D1AE-4B54-429F-962A-488F2AA1F895@delong.com> <CAPt1N1ma45GKqXcvjHUGCYFKVbEGp3OuT013pZhrnOkFFLMiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2Pe+=tNkA7Ou9KeMkgFhcdSb8WxgVn1w9MauusMEhRcw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881076DFF8A145C8CD818B8D8B69@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <A188D974-3CEB-497F-93EA-B66C77D2CA90@delong.com> <YWW1ghmjueHmfCEb@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930:0:0:0:200:2]); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zaWhrXgZnRtulthzh4e_1Xm211k>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:29:04 -0000

> I strongly dislike the implications of "any larger site that has a wifi
> network needs to have a /52 provisioned, so thousands of wifi clients
> can have a /64 *each*" on address space management on all layers.

Agreed… A /48 is a much better choice than a /52.

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email