IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Improving ND security

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A03A08C6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 926H2fuZ-gGQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A543A0EB8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id r19so5808881qvw.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=6IIynSuAndmkNL11taltJg3Jcr4QGplkjzw/dksWoDE=; b=twIYQ2D/8dWqIRCY8vDIftLaJjRCgKk3YW/ZIM8/mnC0L7leASMehUIvo8FMvk+Jof JwDFDsH9NeZG7UOpAJhGPYJGXhohQJy8Dbt/gEtiXMoSZUKPGrPE1xH5m9QymFcDIYXh 8VOKy7QXHmr2SmrCeJZh+5Mcn3Ru+DkHdH/zJilF40A3Cm7gjgDlbgW2yzWxV2XsfYIa P6c2H4sVECaNnJBCoQOA+eqhurLKA1QkkfAwatk5YNoSi+L6GDXrVxPu3IIPDBeQQUjh Nj+JbDIYPnLtbs5afjy9jOzh6AjWkl2fDrOJn+lyFWbeMZya95DkxYDyOIM/pnvNx2Jc CVVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=6IIynSuAndmkNL11taltJg3Jcr4QGplkjzw/dksWoDE=; b=c1EYox/Fe2fMgscV5TQh5kdkc92eQntIOAgQFLeaf48aJNiKU/wGQDi4o8frzqjX+L kL30dGblYsKso2GzFSoPpFcclnZHj+/JnUf5O8PxdgsHHHE1meyX8+tzh5LELInB0Xo7 GzuojmYCp56x5pp0TzhYPWj42ZY5LJwjFn5taUFONDp4bmGDFJJ9L99xbqipQV2GH6kq FC1u9y7/8XaZ8JF4Pq8a5nQrDptmBjz28LAvcxEjM7Th4tqL2V9W2LIpovffmhuWaUgP tJf9B7ks7tOBW30Lu4AnkWr4uO7C5VhfH4Gwa3rnEVGxVxvsfeZP+O/pcq0B2DDwersr UbOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306WF42lKOCe+ZndoXCVuszwVNtRjH9PsYVztJoLHZm7GZ0HQTk /QUmELb7qv87lLrYh+MTrfNIeA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGM62jyvAYZXos3Uy+GZUaiQLnIgXx4ds5hmjB0q0G1/aoQxORWnmoPYJpyR8yfhanyWfM6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b791:: with SMTP id l17mr4883168qve.44.1596210809906; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:1d5e:d83c:760:89f9? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:1d5e:d83c:760:89f9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t65sm7529831qkf.119.2020.07.31.08.53.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5FB3E98B-6CEE-458C-90B7-E6FD73C7AFDE@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B67D32EE-1699-404F-B189-A506157B3E8F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:53:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <a43ffd94d6364a0f869cd4c694ab7432@boeing.com>
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <96fa6d80137241dd9b57fcd871c8a897@huawei.com> <CAFU7BARePzdeU5DFgoOWyrF0xZCj67_xkC2t8vMN2nH0d8aUig@mail.gmail.com> <37e2a7110f6b423eba0303811913f533@huawei.com> <CAFU7BATiD8RkiWXjrxGuAJU-BUwRQCErYZivUPZ-Mc_up_qGxQ@mail.gmail.com> <aebc46c9b813477b9ae0db0ef33e7bd9@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2yL7+GbO6QRaNzFYoBXLF-JZ2NfwgTTt2zerKhJLwt2Lw@mail.gmail.com> <3C1ECB6F-E667-4200-964F-AB233A0A56E9@cisco.com> <91D98D51-4045-4331-A711-8387ECE73400@fugue.com> <a43ffd94d6364a0f869cd4c694ab7432@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/znr6YZh3oGTVF4q65kUnoHQY--o>
Subject: [v6ops] Improving ND security
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:54:13 -0000


> On Jul 31, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> I think that means that either SEND was ahead of its time and the market for it is only
> now beginning to materialize, or SEND is somehow broken and should be deprecated.
> I am interested to know which, since I believe I see a role for SEND.

Yes, it will be interesting to see how this unfolds. I don’t see anybody pushing for SEND at the moment.

v2.3.2 | Report a Bug | By Email