IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE393A0B40; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4b47_CM8S7tm; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E193A0B41; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id fs4so2097624pjb.5; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=am/pg2mSfJF6BXPnHJzmYwz8DszqbhIttIgg0mw79Hk=; b=EfmV5QVXc/37RgxZb50CAapGtYVY5mGrmlUkDuc51n/b0T7/Mtp+q8zv0qMbG/oMgh N2MYCH5gX5gK7VWBTFX5ziYTtaFhx1SE2aHouDjN7vXXEhxm/jw6YgAhB5UPpBaxE6s5 XIYt//hdiFiyP3bDdy7J6g6OO5dYt6knuG/1N5GwMTkGurURE76P2g57GMCRHp8HLEtJ XTVlIYS/lIT+Cf2o3E8vFOLL0EUhPU9qNYaRpEMWTDXLID8h1RysoajWYFvZELg4I/M0 QsWQW8zxG/H9QPVn0HafRfWtwwXR6A+TRQ1mvUtRiRfSC7d2OmH9wsx4E+MjGa4O4q0I Sa7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=am/pg2mSfJF6BXPnHJzmYwz8DszqbhIttIgg0mw79Hk=; b=nmFB5WkaS1eGWNZPTPIgXqniv3VRXOBINVaM+Gtgb7fKtEcqSHE4Kcx6S0MkUjJBOw kl+m0QlV85KtRJZqMSSJyODWmiFk7Ehn07HAnNmjilDSlheJXu3uaQPO3oB/tv7p/SRj JWLH28K5aGHUV2lMrnJudbF7AY+Jr6MTfRbqDHoe/fRZIF3dbrJAS5Z5d8bVvza6Uu/n mqwKObXfJ+X6ENJyX7Jo0+OCgerGx8ISChbVd8+Ac8m5eKzTLZK23P920o5ZCZXV4NtC H6KF0QyVHoqSLDOEB2dXoocKwF5TpeBsA3qzwpZQ739srCtHv6l0W9TMMYJdkJcb2LUC 1DEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533h2qn3JDDUkZSE/NMgdbZS0ytomgQ/t/d72mHSGrNVMgqOKmt4 n2I7b6qDkvSfES6hk/XJMPkpmvto
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC3hp/Dmd2eH42bd/kh3DOsNpVQaAMd6Y4DicdPCwdxVfa32vTFZedHS8ZjWW0HQ0fMzkqRA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7847:: with SMTP id e7mr115475pln.157.1590611078378; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm2777577pfb.73.2020.05.27.13.24.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2020 13:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <BN7PR11MB25478F66E43089F189F98ED4CFA10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN7PR11MB2547A8FA4A7817325482BEF9CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN7PR11MB25473A693F595ECDEFB18194CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d8e16846-59c5-f7bd-431c-fa984cd23fbc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 08:24:32 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB25473A693F595ECDEFB18194CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zu1C8qTO5oF6amA3FFrfro1qjKA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 20:24:41 -0000

On 28-May-20 07:37, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
...
>  1. “Behaviour” is used whereas I think the IETF generally uses American English so “behavior” would be more appropriate?

As far as I know, the RFC Editor aims at consistency within a document, so either all "behaviour" or all "behavior" is OK, and the same for other transatlantic spelling preferences.

     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email