Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
"Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wbeebee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49FD1ACCE7; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:58:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzmCZUK08wtS; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:58:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4C51AC85E; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:58:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4121; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385481502; x=1386691102; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=RoVaCTinWIBwygGiCfb8S5F+JGRJJo2YUT/KAITlU7E=; b=IW4oxPUM1bUknEXEBXHaH3LtCW2Swp8a6+ruIaZUhMpednH8Dj9dl6Op +3k3IyZy8GC68CmUmKbeEOnP8nhPYnpwNPKwgGf8dz1N/XL0vCGzcleBa dePZv7h8Ja/GSujqv1uYwn4QOjQNdLWPSn9HcaanF1J0vLfwfH1DcjZke w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAJ3ElFKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbAA/GoMHOFO6Z4ErFnSCJQEBAQQBAQE3FCALDAQCAQgRAwEBAQ0SCQcnCgEUCQgCBAENBQkLBwIEh2ANNr8IF44pKCsCBQIEhC0DmBSBMIsjhT+DKIFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,775,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="2359450"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2013 15:58:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAQFwLdW022820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:58:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.25]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:58:21 -0600
From: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com>
To: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "ietf-announce@ietf.org" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, "rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
Thread-Index: AQHO6sBUqXBPY2V55Ei1MRCboS6kUw==
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:58:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CEBA2E49.8C5BA%wbeebee@cisco.com>
References: <20131122183301.9E61C75E017@rfc-editor.org> <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806FB9EED1D@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
In-Reply-To: <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806FB9EED1D@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.131.77.158]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <92D2889368E8B546AB6B44AB7902E077@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "drafts-update-ref@iana.org" <drafts-update-ref@iana.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:58:25 -0000
The idea is that a unique /64 is given to each of the LAN interfaces. If there's not enough delegated address space, a system management error SHOULD be logged (the reason it's a SHOULD is that some boxes may not have a web-interface/console to log to). The document doesn't cover the case where you add LAN interfaces to the box - but you could, in principle, follow the same logic there as well - and log an error message. - Wes On 11/25/13 7:54 AM, "Wuyts Carl" <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> wrote: >All, >I can still see it is impossible today to fully comply to this as, IMHO, >the following requirement is impossible to meet (the SHOULD part): >"" >WPD-3: The IPv6 CE router MUST be prepared to accept a delegated > prefix size different from what is given in the hint. If the > delegated prefix is too small to address all of its > interfaces, the IPv6 CE router SHOULD log a system management > error. [RFC6177] covers the recommendations for service > providers for prefix allocation sizes. >"" >Checking if a ia_Pd is "too small" is impossible, i.e., what is "too >small" ? What if certain changes are done after initial ia_pd ? What >.... ? > >Regs >Carl > > >-----Original Message----- >From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >Sent: vrijdag 22 november 2013 19:33 >To: ietf-announce@ietf.org; rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org >Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org; v6ops@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >Subject: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge >Routers > >A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 7084 > > Title: Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer > Edge Routers > Author: H. Singh, W. Beebee, > C. Donley, B. Stark > Status: Informational > Stream: IETF > Date: November 2013 > Mailbox: shemant@cisco.com, > wbeebee@cisco.com, > c.donley@cablelabs.com, > barbara.stark@att.com > Pages: 21 > Characters: 46569 > Obsoletes: RFC 6204 > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-12.txt > > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7084.txt > >This document specifies requirements for an IPv6 Customer Edge (CE) >router. Specifically, the current version of this document focuses on >the basic provisioning of an IPv6 CE router and the provisioning of IPv6 >hosts attached to it. The document also covers IP transition >technologies. Two transition technologies in RFC 5969's IPv6 Rapid >Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd) and RFC 6333's Dual-Stack Lite >(DS-Lite) are covered in the document. The document obsoletes RFC 6204. > >This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the >IETF. > > >INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. >It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of >this memo is unlimited. > >This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. >To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > >For searching the RFC series, see >http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php >For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html > >Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless >specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for >unlimited distribution. > > >The RFC Editor Team >Association Management Solutions, LLC > > >_______________________________________________ >v6ops mailing list >v6ops@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >_______________________________________________ >v6ops mailing list >v6ops@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IPv6 C… rfc-editor
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Jean-Francois.TremblayING
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wuyts Carl
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] RFC 7084 on Basic Requirements for IP… Wes Beebee (wbeebee)