Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 21 January 2018 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66481270A0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIyBGb0hVjhN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1C2127023 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y27so5391394pgc.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=jf79r2D+JWsfaSisLoJcOABKNvHbMRV13am2WJWmQfI=; b=Wm6oXHi1H9IT8BYBhbbl/zfkXAuUJ7MYasKzFBW9i9Me2QaXW+J1KEgm1pTCPvC4Gi CLclGF3OiXG9zTSzr4uTKohcfD0QBfWtlRzBRoZMLMp++unr3SH/hZZdHtRweVbRGfPY GSw+lx40QtpjY7ss0cT1Cj6cWKAc5idgceac06js5YmITh8fX3WgqzDa3h7g91y3s2nN K5omfNbEMcFkr2CnAxXZMgvwEsH/X2Wy0SMeQn6CfDx/1GwOQAIVactDJL+Te8Z5XldF PpjdItHdv0bBJFgDRp1LDX7n/4bjyUawtvbM0tIVPWFQzF5lwDFtTUfqGZY/ooClW1ar EDpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=jf79r2D+JWsfaSisLoJcOABKNvHbMRV13am2WJWmQfI=; b=c4z9GsojD4DelDjAkT2Z9RIX/O459okEPe0yPH5HifzkUxALvkzWtdk+2QjxW8Tmoe 4mvn8Wnv5zcUOPYH/lD+tYtlMMrJ/lrXZUzvxI57Y5Z8WB075QBAgGgWlCO7JVaW4ytO lPOFaXTnutxXYlRC1okwdKmsgcL8KSTZDkAelGSdz2ZQq6rwap4Pe7LM4OjVTGRCvi35 S2h5POo94I/ZrN5TrPm2LFskYKIw2smAFFU0fbLBzeZtAC52EtRoruL3mDzI+izg7JA1 p0kKZhcPLaJDF9v0+5hLf2XMQKrSe7QumQDy+7H9wzV1DdnsRWJvSGfcqDxDdvEa0RmE x8bQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcQOM7G6PQX7ute47UbiqHGDDRyqiUzXu6+jBCtE4OS/MfFxRtU W6tb5mhrQfPy8Ddlb7Y5N1NUZLIy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2270+aVN+IpK/kxLUVLjwyBI9LTHdGRDmCP5iYtRWd9cznzrYnw8Rgeg4FkmUizhAP3lJTnEoA==
X-Received: by 10.98.152.149 with SMTP id d21mr6028659pfk.108.1516562390788; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (ip184-189-218-77.sb.sd.cox.net. [184.189.218.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u79sm26843218pfg.141.2018.01.21.11.19.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FBC32E07-0BE8-45EA-AFE6-484898ABF34A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91C7DFA8-D25E-4D08-A7F1-51F7A4309A16"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:19:48 -0800
In-Reply-To: <0D7FF435-BA8B-40CF-AAC9-4B96F76D058E@steffann.nl>
Cc: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
References: <D687BC24.92CC1%lee@asgard.org> <A6995969-0C03-4261-92F4-331206825130@gmail.com> <0D7FF435-BA8B-40CF-AAC9-4B96F76D058E@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zxJbP1d8Y5Q3LbUDdgPHuIZMFGU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 19:19:53 -0000


> On Jan 21, 2018, at 4:48 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Fred,
> 
> I think this one is the wrong way around:
> 
>> - for scenarios in which IPv6 islands are connected across IPv4 space, use dslite (a tunneling design).
> 
> DS-Lite connects IPv4 islands over IPv6 infra, and 6rd connects IPv6 islands over IPv4 infra.

Shows how much I know. So 6rd had to be mentioned as well.