Re: [v6tc] v6tc - is there life

[Alain Durand <[e-mail]>]

On Nov 18, 2004, at 11:17 AM, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:
> Anyways, I think somebody said that in requirements work it's
> (generally) better to look at the intersection of the requirements and
> not the union of the requirements. This may somewhat apply here as 
> well.

Agree.

>>
>>> Then we just do a quick analysis on the mailing list of the protocols
>>> vs. the requirements and choose the one that seems to be the best fit
>>> as
>>> a *baseline* document.
>>
>> There is no such thing as a "quick analysis on the mailing list", you
>> know that.
>
> Alain, maybe I stated too strongly my wish to do the analysis 
> relatively
> quickly and painlessly. I don't want to start another two year project
> of scenarios and analysis.

Agree 100%. I'm talking about a few months to understand the spectrum 
of solution better.
Let me briefly show some of the trade-off to analyze, and I really do 
not want
to start a thread now on each of them, but just show that those will be 
issues to address
in the very near future.
	- Could we live with UDP encapsulation always on?
	- Do we need mutual authentication? How strong should this be?
	  Should some of this authentication mechanism "follow-on" atfer the 
tunnel set-up phase
	  as finished?
	- Should we embed some kind of signaling in the tunnel?

	- Alain.


_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc