Re: [v6tc] v6tc - is there life

[Alain Durand <[e-mail]>]

On Nov 16, 2004, at 3:39 AM, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:

> 1) Should we still work on the requirements or do the current three
> requirements shape the goal enough?
> (draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements,
> draft-nielsen-v6ops-3GPP-zeroconf-goals,
> draft-suryanarayanan-v6ops-zeroconf-reqs)

I think those 3 documents have served their purpose as is, that is, 
explain
the need for the new wg, so no further work is needed on each one of 
them separately.
However, the new wg would benefit from a combined goals document,
as the above docs shared a lot in common and as we discovered the 
differences
are in the access media properties.
We should get something soon, before the end of the calendar year,
but this should not stop the work in the solution space to start.

Parallel to that, the work on the tunnel-end-point discovery goals 
should advance and integrate
the latest proposal so we can have a meaningful discussion on how to 
implement it.

> 2) Do people have proposals for solutions?

Yes, there are already severals. However, before jumping the gun and 
pushing one particular
solution, what we need to do is look at the different general avenues 
and understand
the tradeoffs in the solution space. As Pekka mentioned, some people 
have started analysis work
(follow up to what we did in San Diego) and preliminary results should 
be published
as individual submission before January 05.

	- Alain.


_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc