Re: [v6tc] v6tc - is there life

[Alain Durand <[e-mail]>]

On Nov 16, 2004, at 11:08 PM, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:

> Hello,
>
> in the interest of time, I would propose that a *simple* goals document
> is written that comprises the requirements from all three requirements
> documents. This is then used as a guideline when designing the 
> protocol.
> Also I'm a bit afraid if we start elaborated requirements/analysis/gap
> analysis/etc. this project will take number of years or we don't even 
> wg
> started as we cannot show that we really need this new protocol.
>
> Basically, I propose that we combine the current requirements to a
> single document that the authors of the current document do together -
> in fairly short time. Parallel to that people would submit their
> protocol proposals as Internet-Drafts.

This is the process I have described in my previous mail, where things
will get done in parallel. However, one should not confuse speed with 
rush,
and there are serious tradeoff to consider in the different avenues in 
the solution
space, and it is worth spending some time (a couple months at most) 
looking at them.
This, of course, should not stop people from submitting their protocol 
proposal
as individual ID.

> Then we just do a quick analysis on the mailing list of the protocols
> vs. the requirements and choose the one that seems to be the best fit 
> as
> a *baseline* document.

There is no such thing as a "quick analysis on the mailing list", you 
know that.

	- Alain.


_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc