IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr> Fri, 08 April 2005 17:35 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16563; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:35:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJxWq-0001rn-IK; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:44:25 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJxLP-0000r8-Vo; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:32:35 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJxLP-0000qw-1o for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:32:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16267 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJxUB-0001iJ-GT for v6tc@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:41:40 -0400
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id j38HWBg13026; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:32:11 +0200
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j38HWBJg012937; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:32:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr)
Message-Id: <200504081732.j38HWBJg012937@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:12:25 +0300. <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504081311420.2531@netcore.fi>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:32:11 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>, Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   L2TP ?
   
=> L2TP works in very bad networks (private addressing, paranoid filtering,
etc) so IMHO we should keep it in our toolkit. It is a standard,
there are many implementations (I use it over every Linuxes and BSDs)
and it is ISP friendly (ISPs are still fond of PPP :-).

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

PS: it seems a cleaned TSP and L2TP are enough for v6tc stuff.

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email