IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6tc] v6tc draft charter discussion

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Fri, 12 November 2004 15:30 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA12596; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:30:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSdPM-0002hi-2q; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:32:16 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSdEQ-0007lG-Lq; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:20:58 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSdAc-00060k-9O for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:17:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA11326 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:16:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from noc.sixxs.net ([213.197.29.32] ident=postfix) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSdBq-0002Of-F2 for v6tc@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:18:28 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noc.sixxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AC388194; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:16:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from noc.sixxs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (noc [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06533-02; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:16:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firenze.zurich.ibm.com (pat.zurich.ibm.com [195.176.20.45]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noc.sixxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8255788035; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:16:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [v6tc] v6tc draft charter discussion
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411121554090.20003@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411121554090.20003@netcore.fi>
Organization: Unfix
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:16:38 +0100
Message-Id: <1100272598.22942.29.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-4)
X-Virus-Scanned: noc.sixxs.net - http://www.sixxs.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Cc: v6tc@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1975688309=="
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88

On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 16:06 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> (If folks don't mind, I'll try to ensure that the process is moving 
> forward until WG chair(s) is appointed or someone else steps up..)

Pekka, you are already doing a great job for v6ops, and as this WG is a
spin-off and mostly related to v6ops it would be IMHO a good idea to
have the same chairs, so that they can better overview the work.
Of course, if you have the time etc to do it.

<SNIP>
>   (1) Based on the input documents, gain rough consensus on at most
>       *one* to-be-standardized approach to fit these goals.
> 
>   (2) Work on two components of the solution:
>          a) method to discover the tunnel end-point; and
>          b) the specification of the tunnel set-up protocol.

psst, you forget:

c) The specification of the tunneling protocol (when it is a new one)

also I assume with "set-up" you mean "optional negotiation and
configuration".

Greets,
 Jeroen


_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email