Re: [v6tc] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-liumin-v6ops-silkroad-02.txt
Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM> Wed, 17 November 2004 06:17 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA15684;
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:17:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
id 1CUJAE-0007yY-CC; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:19:34 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
id 1CUJ34-0002pJ-UY; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:12:10 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CUIxy-0001K6-71
for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:06:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA14689
for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com ([192.18.98.36])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUJ08-0007lc-Nx
for v6tc@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:09:20 -0500
Received: from esunmail ([129.147.156.34])
by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAH66fNH010694
for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:06:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: from fe7 (esunmail [129.147.156.34]) by edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <0I7B00ATR7N4KW@edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM> for
v6tc@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:06:40 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([66.93.39.75])
by mail.sun.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21
2004))
with ESMTPSA id <0I7B00D3D7N2HK@mail.sun.net> for v6tc@ietf.org; Tue,
16 Nov 2004 23:06:39 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:06:37 -0800
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [v6tc] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-liumin-v6ops-silkroad-02.txt
In-reply-to: <00cd01c4cc40$b270b2c0$4b74a8c0@ThinkPadX31>
To: Liu Min <liumin@ict.ac.cn>
Message-id: <D72EA5C3-385E-11D9-85A3-00039376A6AA@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <00cd01c4cc40$b270b2c0$4b74a8c0@ThinkPadX31>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: v6tc@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>,
<mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>,
<mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Thank you for your submission. In my personal opinion, Silkroad is a fairly complex model, and a lot of the complexity is rooted in the desire to enable direct communication between two silknodes within the same ISP. However, in the v6tc case, such direct communication has not been identified as a required component. IMHO, it would actually help the v6tc discussions if you could separate the tunnel set-up part between the SC and the SAR from the rest of the silkroad model. - Alain. _______________________________________________ v6tc mailing list v6tc@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc