[VCARDDAV]Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (8092)

[Michael Douglass <[e-mail]>]

The spec defines both N and FN as being text values - and text is 
defined in section 3 as being UTF-8 as defined in RFC3629. Is that 
insufficient?

On 9/3/24 14:58, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350,
> "vCard Format Specification".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8092
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Gastón Mascareñas <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 6.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> (none - missing)
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> (See notes)
>
> Notes
> -----
> This RFC does not provide guidance nor an example of how to specify names for the N and FN Identification Properties when these contain special characters, for example as in my name Gastón Mascareñas.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : vCard Format Specification
> Publication Date    : August 2011
> Author(s)           : S. Perreault
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : vCard and CardDAV
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> VCARDDAV mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]