Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4245)

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 02 March 2015 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5601A87BB for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJPVbkRIrm_e for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com (mail-la0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82D91A87A7 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so30662040lam.11 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UkoeyLQVSjZdbegNeqKC6LOtyY29qTu4eR/RBK/fvJI=; b=GZDo71Ki/MxA0wH/8gL8HAj0nXAq8aVNMKCch1yZaltIyMAY2n7NPmfcUEwblrMPR3 2FgMDPLEfDBMiOkKWdMLit58hGtnjEy6N//MPQkRIyM6h8jfp1+4QcxKgTdPEzWJjk5M 9Yms63z6+qvBnHyP7FRhmvUUXhGd99zVRgU1LKToENwuxrfqm0yE2Qjg1RP4JyPWBcj/ V6ARfX5l5JqOp53Q4w6uJSXf7hAm3T1NCabAROqHT3WhxoCtj/IsVXrHIriZj4nBGoIY TC5mBmM/F+rSS71N6shPdcVrjxMWgEySCyVsknBH5w3FfrrN9qPmTYx/9oPXdk5Wmmqp Q4BQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlO0e+kx1Xai40HUU+Fc1sXz03QbeU7YD49jN/KrlTQdgkRBCfQ+teO2PJvnKiXTMOPJgwI
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.207.72 with SMTP id lu8mr19705815lac.90.1425307273216; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.205.144 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL0+x5uA2Z9CnW3FjysZntCgK_24eCVHUThme7WJkjzYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150127140643.86577180489@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJL0+x5uA2Z9CnW3FjysZntCgK_24eCVHUThme7WJkjzYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:41:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CANO7kWDQL79YjZSjHaKtovvx=tZmYAE6TnOY1RcbH3CyhScO2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11346650b75d3205104f35eb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/4bS3iUd1EC2rDrDdJoc59JOy2to>
Cc: ivan.enderlin@fruux.com, CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4245)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:41:20 -0000

Although the original text would not cause interoperability issues, the
corrected text is more accurate and better represents the WG's consensus at
the time the RFC was published.

I am thoroughly confused about errata statuses, so I won't make a
recommandation. ;)

Simon

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> Simon, can you please comment on this errata report?
>
> Thanks,
> Barry
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:06 PM, RFC Errata System
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350,
> > "vCard Format Specification".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=4245
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Ivan Enderlin <ivan.enderlin@fruux.com>
> >
> > Section: 6.7.7
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >    Value type:  A semicolon-separated pair of values.  The first field
> >       is a small integer corresponding to the second field of a PID
> >       parameter instance.  The second field is a URI.  The "uuid" URN
> >       namespace defined in [RFC4122] is particularly well suited to this
> >       task, but other URI schemes MAY be used.
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >    Value type:  A single structured text value consisting of components
> >       separated by the SEMICOLON character (U+003B). The first
> >       component is a small integer corresponding to the second
> >       component of a PID parameter instance.  The second component is a
> >       URI. The "uuid" URN namespace defined in [RFC4122] is particularly
> >       well suited to this task, but other URI schemes MAY be used.
> >
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > A "semicolon-separated pair of values" is a structured text value.
> Moreover, the RFC6351 considers the CLIENTPIDMAP property with a structured
> text value (see the Relax NG Schema definition of property-clientpidmap).
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : vCard Format Specification
> > Publication Date    : August 2011
> > Author(s)           : S. Perreault
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : vCard and CardDAV
> > Area                : Applications
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
>