Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call comments on vcardrev-11
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 12 July 2010 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAD93A695A for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id txNFJ4-06pg4 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEA93A685C for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:1185:913c:8f94:4d7c]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 067BA20D1C for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C3B2FCA.5000506@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:07:54 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <0506F7DE00AA916F6562B1CD@cmu-294450.wv.cc.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <0506F7DE00AA916F6562B1CD@cmu-294450.wv.cc.cmu.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call comments on vcardrev-11
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:11:29 -0000
On 2010-05-31 13:38, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > General comment: inconsistent capitalization. e.g. Section 5.6 has > '"type" parameter' and 'TYPE parameter'. We should use one style of > capitalization and quotation throughout. No doubt the RFC editor would > catch this but we can help than out a little by fixing it ourselves. I tried to fix that in -12. If you see more of it, please let me know. > Section 3.2: ANNIVERSARY missing from name = ABNF. Fixed. > Section 3.2: calscale-param missing from param = ABNF. Fixed. > Section 4.3.2 change "Midnight" to "The midnight hour". Fixed. > Section 5: For consistency the GEO and TZ parameters should be defined > in this section. Agreed. > * Section 5.2: This talks about "Content-Transfer-Encoding" which comes > from MIME. But there is no reference. I don't think we should be talking > about how vCards are MIME encoded - the MIME specs take care of that. > Plus HTTP (e.g. CardDAV uses Transfer-Encoding as its header). Probably > best to generalize the text here to simply mention that a "transport > encoding" may be applied to the whole vcard and that is independent of > any "ENCODING" used for property values. I would also like to see an > explicit reference to the appropriate MIME spec for the "base64" mention. Agreed. > Section 5.2: The "b" parameter value should be case-insensitive. We need > to explicitly state that or use "b"/"B". In ABNF, "b" is case-insensitive. I added text to make it explicit. > Section 5.4: The ABNF should probably be defined in terms of a "positive > integer between 1 and 100". You mean adding a comment? Done. > Section 5.5: Change "only may have" to "only have". Changed to "may have only". Isn't that better? > Section 5.5: Add "positive" in front of "integer" and "integers". Done. > Section 5.6: Change "in case the" to "in the case that". Fixed. > * Section 5.6: The restriction on "work" and "home" usage related to > presence and value of "KIND" seems a little odd. What is more, it does > not use RFC2119 key words so it is not clear if this is a "real" > requirement or not. This needs to be better defined, or the restriction > should be removed. Removed. > * Section 6.1.5: "group" should not be restricted to a group of > "people". For example, I might want a group for all the locations in a > particular building. Agreed. > * Section 6.1.6: So we need to allow for binary content in addition to > text. Point being that newer versions of XML do allow for control > characters in the XML - but vCard does not allow control characters. So > a base64 encoding would be needed to handle that. > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml-04 also > has the same problem). Ok. So we allow the ENCODING parameter to specify base64 encoding. > We might also need a "VERSION" parameter to > indicate the expected XML version being generated. Agreed. > Section 6.2.5 & 6.2.6: Not wrong, but I do not understand why the -param > ABNF definitions are split into two. The PHOTO property ABNF uses a > different style of syntax element grouping to achieve the same kind of > thing. It's just to make clear to which par the "Value and parameter MUST match" comment applies. The PHOTO property is a bit more involved because it has parameters that may only be used with a given value type. It's basically the same idea. > * Section 6.2.7 & 6.2.8 - BIRTH/DEATH: since we can represent locations > via a vCard we should allow a reference to a vCard via a URI as a value > type for these two properties. Yes. This would also allow usage of the "geo" URI scheme. > * Section 6.2.9: Can we not restrict ANNIVERSARY to just marriage? For > example, for an organization I might want to specify the date of > incorporation or founding etc. Ideally there would be a TYPE parameter > on this property that could have pre-defined types like "marriage", > "founding", "incorporation", "purchase". ANNIVERSARY was added to the draft only because many current implementations have such a non-standard property for specifying the marriage anniversary. While it seems like a straightforward idea to me, adding a TYPE parameter would depart from current usage. Figuring out what type values to allow would amount to figuring out future usage. Therefore I think it would be better to leave this feature for a future extension. > Section 6.4.1: "textphone" is not listed in the type-param-tel = ABNF. Added. > Section 6.5.1: Change "DST" to "daylight savings time". Change "in may > regions" to "in many regions". Change "offset entirely" to "overall > offset". Done. > * Section 6.6.6: I still believe we should have "father", "mother", > "brother" and "sister". This was discussed before. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/current/msg00787.html The points raised against that proposal were: - It's English-specific. For example in Hungarian you have 4 words: "báty", "öcs", "nővér", and "húg". - There is a lot more genealogy terminology that could be added. - It's redundant with the SEX property. > In the case where the value is just text it > would be better to have the more specific types. You are of course free to use X-sister and X-brother. To me, the value being text and this issue seem orthogonal. > Section 6.6.6: Change "sometimes on" to "sometimes act on". Fixed. > Section 6.6.6: Remove: 'starting with "X-"'. Done. > Section 6.7.9: Should not use "real" names in the example domains. Just > use the example.org one by itself. Agreed. Removed all examples but the example.org one. > Section 6.8.2: Change: "a value outside of this MIME entity" to "an > external value". Fixed. > * Section 6.8.2: Why is the TYPE parameter not allowed with a URI value? > e.g. PHOTO, LOGO and SOUND all allow TYPE with a URI value. Actually the > example in Section 8 uses TYPE=work. So what should type be? A MIME > type, or work/home indicator. And why can TYPE be either of those? > iCalendar uses FMTTYPE for the MIME type parameter, I think we should > take the opportunity with this revision to fix the overloading of the > TYPE parameter. Lets add FMTTYPE as the MIME type parameter. I like this a lot. Done. > * Section 6.8.2: The Encoding section talks about a "text value" where > the encoding is "8bit", but the only value types defined are binary and > URI. Is value=text allowed (and I think it should be because some key > formats are text based)? If so, the ABNF needs adjusting, otherwise the > Encoding text needs to be adjusted. I did both. 8bit has no meaning for a text value, it is always UTF-8. So I removed that sentence in the encoding section. I also changed the ABNF to allow text. > Section 6.9.1: Change: "To specify the URI for a user's busy time in a > vCard object." to "To specify the URI for the busy time associated with > the object that the vCard represents." Done. > Section 6.9.1 (and elsewhere): Please add informative reference to RFC > 5545 for occurrences of "iCalendar". Done. > Section 6.9.1: "last six weeks" - realistically the range of busy time > returned is implementation defined. Plus it would not be the "last" six > weeks, but rather the "next" six weeks. So change "last six weeks" to > "next few weeks or months". Also remove "users's" - this can apply to > resources too. Done. > Section 6.9.2: Change "location" to "calendar user address [RFC5545]". > Change "an event request" to "a scheduling request [RFC5546]". Change > "user" to "user or resource".cw Done. > Section 6.9.3: Change: "To specify the URI for a user's calendar in a > vCard object." to "To specify the URI for a calendar associated with the > object that the vCard represents." Done. > * Section 9: 5th bullet: I am not sure URL is the right property to > refer to. I think SOURCE is better. SOURCE should point to a > "definitive" source for the data in the vCard. Absolutely! Fixed. > * Section 10.1: (as per previous email) please add a "version" parameter > to the MIME type to make content negotiation easier with CardDAV. Done. > * Section 10.2.4: why aren't VND- parameters allowed? Oversight. Added namespace field to parameters registry. > Section A.3: add XML and CLIENTPIDMAP as new properties. Done. Whew! Thanks for the review! Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
- [VCARDDAV] Last call comments on vcardrev-11 Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call comments on vcardrev-11 Markus Lorenz
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Last call comments on vcardrev-11 Simon Perreault