IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] Related Changes?

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 13 December 2010 04:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A647E3A6DAE for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:45:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.311, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-pm280AwfXV for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED23A67D8 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (ip-216-17-182-51.rev.frii.com [216.17.182.51]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C90CA400F6; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:59:26 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4D05A545.3080901@stpeter.im>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:47:01 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
References: <E20A7CF0-46DA-47DE-940D-1B43C204691B@iannella.it> <4D02449D.3020003@viagenie.ca> <4D024B4E.8030005@viagenie.ca> <09C5A626D683B7F93C1AF680@cyrus.local> <4D0250A2.5090302@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4D0250A2.5090302@viagenie.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms060904070408000006030700"
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Related Changes?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:45:35 -0000

On 12/10/10 9:09 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> Le 10-12-10 07:50, Cyrus Daboo a écrit :
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> --On December 10, 2010 7:46:22 AM -0800 Marc Blanchet
>> <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> one way to solve this would be to setup an IANA registry where its
>>> initial content would be XFN and additional types we wanted such as
>>> manager, assistant, ...
>>
>> I think that is the logical way to proceed assuming there is no
>> objection from XFN folks.
> 
> well, they could continue their XFN registry and the IANA one may not be
> fully synchronized at a given date. We can have a IANA registration
> policy that have expert review which would enable easy sync of the two
> registries.

Yes, that seems reasonable.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email