IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 30 January 2012 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F61621F85C4 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:54:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UU8jWI1CcQDq for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F0021F85B8 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:80f9:39e9:9453:692c]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2B4C21F45; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:54:40 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F26E770.6090400@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:54:40 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <20120130182941.6F376B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4F26E44D.6060807@viagenie.ca> <4F26E5BE.7020202@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4F26E5BE.7020202@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (3100)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:54:42 -0000

On 2012-01-30 13:47, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> So is this "Reject" or "Hold for Document Update"?

I was hoping to discuss it further, but if you want a verdict right now 
I'd say "Reject". It's clear that there is something wrong in the RFC, 
but the proposed fix is also wrong.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status