Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org
"Javier Godoy" <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> Tue, 13 July 2010 09:59 UTC
Return-Path: <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BDF3A67F0 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.523, BAYES_40=-0.185, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPOhsvhd7I3H for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fich.unl.edu.ar (fich.unl.edu.ar [168.96.132.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC43A659B for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Javier2 ([190.193.109.175]) (authenticated user rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar) by fich.unl.edu.ar (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits)); Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:59:32 -0300
Message-ID: <BFC1A8EBC9144912AC0E96090D07B0F6@Javier2>
From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
References: <4C3C06AD.6080902@nokia.com><7E6A76EE90CB4FB1AA1E3009C0A044FC@Javier2> <AANLkTinJ9kHkYgygQjlcJ6cFsoX_TCIOswhZ_dK5oEN1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:59:47 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:59:22 -0000
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:50 AM "Dan Brickley" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> > wrote: >> Hi Kevin, >> >> KIND:"org" means the vCard instance represents the organization itself. In >> this case the organization name is given in ORG and there is no N property >> (because there are no surnames or given names). In vCard 3.0 it was not >> clear how to represent organizations, because the N property had always to >> be present. >> >> KIND:"group" means the vCard represents a "group of individuals", such as a >> mailing list, a set of contacts, etc. A group may have MEMBERs, while other >> kinds of vCard can't. > > Is this recursive? Can the members of a group be groups? > > Dan I think it is allowed (defining "group" as "group of individuals" was an oversimplification). The value of MEMBER is a URI that is not required to identify a vCard of the "individual" KIND, hence I understand recursive groups are allowed. Moreover, it is not required to identify a vCard instance: it may be a resource other than a vCard (such as a mailto: URI). Best Regards Javier
- [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Kevin Wu Won
- Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Javier Godoy
- Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Dan Brickley
- Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Javier Godoy
- Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND:group vs. KIND:org Simon Perreault