Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 22 June 2010 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BC93A6A27 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujReEKxs1kd4 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FDE3A68A0 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balaise.nomis80.org (modemcable245.152-21-96.mc.videotron.ca [96.21.152.245]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5CC020DC3; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C214045.4050703@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:59:17 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
References: <AANLkTiniY60njEGixPGeKvs_m1LE_uVrvtnDQuXrP7jV@mail.gmail.com> <4C20B501.6030802@viagenie.ca> <8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2>
In-Reply-To: <8822D300A5ED445A8CB9C6BB9B60A4E7@Javier2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] Questions about vCard 4.0 (draft rev-11)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:59:11 -0000

On 06/22/2010 05:16 PM, Javier Godoy wrote:
> From section 2.3 of RFC 5234
> ABNF strings are case insensitive .
> To specify a rule that is case sensitive, specify the characters
> individually.
> For example:
>   rulename    =  %d97 %d98 %d99
> 
> So the ABNF above should be
> 
> BEGIN-value = %d86 %d67 %d65 %d82 %d68; uppercase "VCARD"

Wow! I didn't know that! Thanks!

Ok so we have two options:

1. Leave the ABNF as is but state that the value is case insensitive.
2. Change the ABNF and state that the value is case sensitive.

I think I would prefer 1.

> Maybe we also want to review the ABNF for "Z" and "T" in zone and
> timestamp.

Definitely!

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org