Re: [VCARDDAV] UID - why singular, not plural/ multiple?

Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it> Mon, 26 July 2010 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <renato@iannella.it>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E313A6834 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OeE9c6ySvudY for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authsmtp.register.it (authsmtp04.register.it [81.88.48.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E053A679F for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21999 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 11:34:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (smtp@iannella.it@211.31.38.254) by authsmtp.register.it with ESMTPA; 26 Jul 2010 11:34:14 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it>
In-Reply-To: <4C4D36D0.5090406@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:34:11 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8B3D3105-B196-4677-8E17-FF11D7F2C63B@iannella.it>
References: <993c954c9d05383050d996723eb3275d.squirrel@webmail.gradwell.com> <4C4C2F35.7010701@viagenie.ca> <62655a6e757b64c307b5e045746f0cfc.squirrel@webmail.gradwell.com> <4C4C43E9.3080700@viagenie.ca> <7FEEBCBA-FD05-4B7E-A269-61A5BB11AC82@iannella.it> <4C4D36D0.5090406@viagenie.ca>
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] UID - why singular, not plural/ multiple?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:33:59 -0000

On 26 Jul 2010, at 17:18, Simon Perreault wrote:

> Absolutely. It depends on how you interpret the URI. In the context of a UID,
> it's not supposed to be dereferenced.

Should we say that in the spec then?

Cheers

Renato Iannella
http://renato.iannella.it